|
Post by Johnkenn on Mar 6, 2014 13:34:07 GMT -6
Just wanted to ask opinions...I've got kind of a weird space - basically just around a 22'x12' length and width with kind of an A-frame roof line. Right now, I have a "vocal" area where I've placed 6" thick bass traps rockwul, 4" thick mineral fiber/OC703 clouds and hung the 2 inch thick absorber type panes to cut the room in a third. The rest, you can see where I've put Auralex foam to stop flutter echoes. I'm really asking about the little tracking area I have. Is this too much absorption? It's dead as a doornail...Should I open up the room? When I pull those absorbers down, I do hear some reflections...Am I getting the best vocal sound I can get by just deadening everything? I've considered constructing a vocal booth outside of this room...build something from the ground up...but is it overkill? Just thinking out loud and open to any suggestions. Forgive the crappy iphone pano... i400.photobucket.com/albums/pp82/Johnkenn22/photo_zpscd8a673d.jpg
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Mar 6, 2014 13:34:52 GMT -6
The dimensions look a little screwy because of the pano...
|
|
|
Post by geoff738 on Mar 6, 2014 14:22:33 GMT -6
What about using one of those reflection filter thingeys- like the SE one? I've never used one - heard kinda mixed reviews, but could be a way to tame some reflections if you opened things up and didn't like what it did on vox.
Cheers, Geoff
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Mar 6, 2014 14:25:04 GMT -6
I've had one before...meh...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 6, 2014 15:01:13 GMT -6
I've had one before...meh... I'm with you there, my company's Portable Vocal Booth is much better. But from what I can see you should be all set as you have it now. Small rooms need to be dead. Small-room ambience sounds lousy. You can always add better reverb or ambience after. --Ethan
|
|
|
Post by cowboycoalminer on Mar 6, 2014 15:19:59 GMT -6
I've had one before...meh... I'm with you there, my company's Portable Vocal Booth is much better. But from what I can see you should be all set as you have it now. Small rooms need to be dead. Small-room ambience sounds lousy. You can always add better reverb or ambience after. --Ethan Defiantly agree with this. Kill the room is my moto.
|
|
|
Post by dandeurloo on Mar 11, 2014 21:33:41 GMT -6
I have Ethan's PVB. I like it better then the SE. I think its better because its bigger. I will also say I never use them how you see them in photos. That usually just makes things sound boxy. I put it behind the singer so the mic doesn't pick up a bunch of crap behind the singer. John, you could try something like that. I think you would be shocked how much that helps.
|
|
|
Post by tonycamphd on Mar 11, 2014 22:01:13 GMT -6
Small room ambience can sound great as long as the SPL's are low, get some broadband diffusion up and c what u get, keep the ceiling dead though. Also, if ur talking about those u shaped mic shield absorber thingys, I concur...meh.. Not good, unless maybe as danderlou suggested.
|
|
|
Post by Martin John Butler on Mar 11, 2014 22:25:07 GMT -6
At AES I saw an amazing portable vocal booth, but I've forgotten the name. It had windows, and really looked first class, and well constructed. It was almost like one you'd build in, but this one was already done.
|
|
|
Post by RicFoxx on Mar 12, 2014 7:38:43 GMT -6
Man, I hate singin in dead rooms...very unnatural but a necessity in a small room. I sing best when Im inspired by the sound Im receiving back in the phones. That means minimal latency, some verb (room ambience) , compression and the right levels. I achieve this with a small console and Apollo. I don't record the compression/reverb and I don't EQ.
John, your stuff sounds great...what do you feel the problem is.
|
|
|
Post by matt on Mar 12, 2014 8:05:15 GMT -6
At AES I saw an amazing portable vocal booth, but I've forgotten the name. It had windows, and really looked first class, and well constructed. It was almost like one you'd build in, but this one was already done. Did you see this? vocalbooth.comNice stuff, but expensive, seems to me. A large, well-appointed booth could top $10K. Hopefully they offer deep discounts!
|
|
|
Post by jcoutu1 on Mar 12, 2014 8:18:41 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by svart on Mar 12, 2014 9:44:15 GMT -6
First... Let me ask you.. What are you trying to fix?
I'm guessing the answer is that you don't know. That's a common issue with the DIY crowd. They don't know enough about something to make a rational decision, but yet they feel compelled to do something based on what they read in forums. It leads folks astray and onto wild goose chases as they always question everything.
So let me ask another question.. What do you find yourself fixing on vocals in the mix? Do you always cut certain frequencies, boost others, or do low cuts, etc? Think hard about it and you'll notice that you tend to do certain things over and over. Those are things that need fixing in the room more than likely.
Take me for example. I almost always needed to cut around 1khz and below 200hz in my room. I built a handful of tuned absorbers around 1khz and put bass traps in every large corner. Now I need almost no cuts at 1khz and 200hz.
Understand?
So, my suggestion is that you reset yourself and your room and take all that crap down off the walls. Now do some vocal tracks, preferably a man and woman singing different styles. Now analyze the work you need to do to make the vocals sound "right" and now you have your plan.
I'd bet on bass traps and some midrange absorption around the walls to keep reflections down.
|
|
|
Post by jcoutu1 on Mar 12, 2014 15:01:17 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by mobeach on Mar 12, 2014 17:08:17 GMT -6
My room is about the same size, I put the booth in the corner beside my bass rig, I then attach two thick blankets to the ceiling to close it in.
|
|
|
Post by popmann on Mar 15, 2014 17:20:57 GMT -6
First... Let me ask you.. What are you trying to fix? I'm guessing the answer is that you don't know. That's a common issue with the DIY crowd. They don't know enough about something to make a rational decision, but yet they feel compelled to do something based on what they read in forums. It leads folks astray and onto wild goose chases as they always question everything. This. I am really thinking a lot of forum chatter is counterproductive in a number of ways. If there's an ACTUAL state-able problem...there are troubleshooting steps to work it out and isolate the cause and alleviate it. This was actually my point the "magic box" poll...it's not that gear doesn't MATTER--they're tools, of course they MATTER...but, the idea that there's some one size fits all "better" for every job...and that the gear passing signal somehow sounds "good"...is the flawed disconnect, IME. Maybe someone should see Winer three times straight so JK can get a full room acoustics consult straight for the wall pillow pioneer himself. C'mon John...work the angles...you run a site...I bet you could get that mofo to treat your entire room free of charge...run some banner ads...maybe espouse how no piece of gear, or CERTAINLY sample rate improved your recordings like Winer's Wall Pillows. "My demos sounded like a typical home recording BEFORE his consult...but, after--check out the cut I got on Tonic's new record!"
|
|
|
Post by cowboycoalminer on Mar 16, 2014 7:47:07 GMT -6
Pop.
You say all that tongue in cheek and I get it. And also way agree that forum chatter gets people in trouble. The question running through everyone's mind when trying to build a studio is "How did they get it to sound like that?" The answer is, there is no one answer. Every room is different and every room will produce a slightly different product, this goes for recording or mixing. But I can say from experience and not forum noise that nothing helped my products more than getting serious about acoustics in my space. It was trial and error at first, then I started studying what's needed to get to a good result. What the problem frequency ranges are in every room and how to battle them ect..
Educating myself yielded mixes that translate good on a broader number of mediums which is in my mind, the goal.
In short, the room can be a friend or an enemy. John Ken 's room sounds fine like he's got it IMO. I've heard his stuff and it sounds good. If it sounds good, it is good.
|
|
|
Post by tonycamphd on Mar 16, 2014 9:24:56 GMT -6
I'm kinda burned out on the "know ur problem" crowd, I am of the opinion that people can be oblivious to problems they have, not game ending problems, but aspects of their set up that unbeknownst to them, could be better, myself definitely included. That is the reason I'm here! To discover and learn what I can do to make my shit better( isn't that why we're all here?) I believe room acoustics are the single most complex, overlooked and patently ignored aspect of home recording spaces, I'd personally rather have an Mbox/57 in a great room than a ssl4000/U47 in an acoustically compromised room any day.
of course JMO
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Mar 16, 2014 10:24:58 GMT -6
Man, I hate singin in dead rooms...very unnatural but a necessity in a small room. I sing best when Im inspired by the sound Im receiving back in the phones. That means minimal latency, some verb (room ambience) , compression and the right levels. I achieve this with a small console and Apollo. I don't record the compression/reverb and I don't EQ. John, your stuff sounds great...what do you feel the problem is. Eh...I don't guess there is a real problem...not with vocals. I actually tried facing the other way last week and I think I had better results...Singing with the hanging baffles right behind my back and door in front. I had been singing the other way before. I guess it's just the fear that I've absorbed this thing into oblivion and I don't really know what I'm doing. I've been threatening to pallet board my lower walls...just for looks really...but maybe that would be a nightmare.
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Mar 16, 2014 10:26:30 GMT -6
First... Let me ask you.. What are you trying to fix? I'm guessing the answer is that you don't know. That's a common issue with the DIY crowd. They don't know enough about something to make a rational decision, but yet they feel compelled to do something based on what they read in forums. It leads folks astray and onto wild goose chases as they always question everything. This. I am really thinking a lot of forum chatter is counterproductive in a number of ways. If there's an ACTUAL state-able problem...there are troubleshooting steps to work it out and isolate the cause and alleviate it. This was actually my point the "magic box" poll...it's not that gear doesn't MATTER--they're tools, of course they MATTER...but, the idea that there's some one size fits all "better" for every job...and that the gear passing signal somehow sounds "good"...is the flawed disconnect, IME. Maybe someone should see Winer three times straight so JK can get a full room acoustics consult straight for the wall pillow pioneer himself. C'mon John...work the angles...you run a site...I bet you could get that mofo to treat your entire room free of charge...run some banner ads...maybe espouse how no piece of gear, or CERTAINLY sample rate improved your recordings like Winer's Wall Pillows. "My demos sounded like a typical home recording BEFORE his consult...but, after--check out the cut I got on Tonic's new record!" I erased my initial post, because maybe I read it wrong. But your reply reads snarky as hell. It was definitely dick-ish.
|
|
|
Post by popmann on Mar 16, 2014 20:17:12 GMT -6
Sorry to have offended. Snarky? Have you MET me? Ha. I'm not sure what part offended you...the only thing I see as dick'ish in the post is absolutely meant to be...BUT wasn't in ANY way aimed at you. (re: "Wall pillows").
If there's a concrete problem, I'm sure someone can help you with it. I don't hear any negative room interaction in any vocal you've posted. Do you? (Edit...I see above that you don't).
|
|
|
Post by svart on Mar 16, 2014 22:07:24 GMT -6
How about this.. Since we never heard if you actually have common issues with vocal tracks that would point to a room problem, I'll suggest a setup that would be most flexible.
I would turn the mic so that the on-axis and 180 off-axis point longways down the room. This way you get the longest reflection time, which is easier to work with. I'd also move the mic around 5-6ft from the rear wall too so that any secondary reflections from nearby surfaces are reduced.. Take your rockwool panels off the walls and hang them from mic stands. Now you can move the panels around the singer and get the best sound. I like just the slightest ambiance with no discernible first reflection as my basic vocal sound. You can use the length of the room to give you the ambiance and the movable "gobo" panels to kill reflection points.
|
|
|
Post by svart on Mar 17, 2014 8:30:06 GMT -6
I'll take a picture of what I tend to do, tonight. Since my room is trapezoidal, I place the talent sort of centered and then turn them slightly so that none of the reflection surfaces are perpendicular to the singer's mouth, so no direct reflections. I'll put my gobos about halfway to the walls so that there is some deadening but allowing all non-straightline reflections to happen. that way I get some ambiance but no slapback reflections, which in small rooms will only cause comb filtering.
|
|
|
Post by lolo on Mar 17, 2014 8:37:25 GMT -6
So whats the general feeling on using these se
|
|
|
Post by svart on Mar 17, 2014 8:49:49 GMT -6
Could work if you are doing really close mic stuff. I feel that if you are using cardioid mics, then a lot of the reflections you pick up are from the sides and behind the person and something like this is marginally helping. I prefer the more distant gobo approach since it gives more ambiance.
Besides, "acoustic foam" like that and Auralex stuff is actually fairly reflective in the mids and lows. It will absorb the very high frequencies which give the impression of "dead" but the midrange tends to bounce right off since the cells of the foam are very small and not very deep. That's why NONE of the truely professional acoustical designers will ever use foam for anything. It's compressed fiberglass, rockwool or acoustical cotton that they use in combination with good structural design (non parallel walls, etc).
|
|