|
Post by christopher on Nov 7, 2024 20:15:27 GMT -6
I’m considering some new converters:
I need another 8 channels minimum. 16 would be ideal. More would he even better, so digiface is attractive.
However if quality is an issue then I don’t want any. But I could possibly with a 2 channel unit to get the magic zone.
|
|
|
Post by doubledog on Nov 7, 2024 22:00:35 GMT -6
I had some initial pain getting it setup and getting used to it (because it was different than the Apollo 16 I had been using for 10+ years) but the Antelope Orion 32 is a pretty good bang for the buck. I paid under $2500 for the Orion 32+ Gen4 (b-stock but it was sealed and everything looks brand new). It was packaged with an MRC which I sold, so now my cost was even less... it's nice having 32 I/O even though I don't really even need that many (24 would have worked). I've used it on a bunch of sessions now and nobody but me has even noticed the change.
|
|
|
Post by thehightenor on Nov 7, 2024 22:36:04 GMT -6
Bought a Ferrofish Pulse 16.
16 I/O over ADAT up to 96KHz all 16 channels.
I use mine with an RME RayDAT and a Crane Song Avocet and HEDD 192.
Next to those Crane Song converters the Pulse sounds very good indeed!
|
|
|
Post by tonycamphd on Nov 7, 2024 23:01:06 GMT -6
If you're going pro get a Hilo 2 then u can expand as u need, if I wasn’t set I’d look into that bla unit, they probably sound nice
|
|
|
Post by Quint on Nov 7, 2024 23:17:24 GMT -6
Bought a Ferrofish Pulse 16. 16 I/O over ADAT up to 96KHz all 16 channels. I use mine with an RME RayDAT and a Crane Song Avocet and HEDD 192. Next to those Crane Song converters the Pulse sounds very good indeed! Do you have any other converters you're using besides the ones you just listed, or is this it? I know you like to use hardware inserts, so I was just wondering how you were getting all of your hardware into the computer?
|
|
|
Post by yotonic on Nov 7, 2024 23:28:54 GMT -6
Apogee Symphony SE is the best converter I’ve owned. Spent a small fortune getting there but the trip was worth it.
|
|
|
Post by notneeson on Nov 7, 2024 23:50:23 GMT -6
Meh. I’ve used most of the fancy stuff. It’s not a huge delta at all. The reason to buy the expensive stuff (to me) is so you never have to think about it again.
If you really want a bargain, the OG Lynx Auroras still sound like they did 15 years ago: very good.
Of course there are plenty of other considerations: connectivity, software integration, failure rates, planned obsolescence ala Apogee.
|
|
|
Post by thehightenor on Nov 8, 2024 2:42:49 GMT -6
Bought a Ferrofish Pulse 16. 16 I/O over ADAT up to 96KHz all 16 channels. I use mine with an RME RayDAT and a Crane Song Avocet and HEDD 192. Next to those Crane Song converters the Pulse sounds very good indeed! Do you have any other converters you're using besides the ones you just listed, or is this it? I know you like to use hardware inserts, so I was just wondering how you were getting all of your hardware into the computer? I’ve been rendering a lot of stuff as I go and not running everything live. If I add more conversion I’m thinking of investing in a Wes Audio Titan rack with his 8 channel Ada and just plumbing the Titan straight into the RME RayDAT card. That way I can run more analogue processing live as all the Wes Audio has plugin instant recall. Longer term, I’m thinking of adding a BLA 8x8 for some more Ada to run more of my gear live - but really the Wes Audio is probably the way to go as it fixes the issue of analog recall. I did toy with the Ferrofish A32 for 32 I/O but it’s all on DB25 and what I like about the Pulse 16 and BLA 8x8 is it’s on TRS. I know TRS is less “pro” but for a rig like mine it lets me splash my signal around my studio space as I have a small analogue monitor mixer, some guitar re-amp boxes, a Boss waza TAE, a desktop 8x8 TT bay etc and TRS is just so flexible spreading signal about in a typical studio space set up for self engineering.
|
|
kcatthedog
Temp
Super Helpful Dude
Posts: 16,024
Member is Online
|
Post by kcatthedog on Nov 8, 2024 3:45:50 GMT -6
Aurora N.
|
|
|
Post by tonycamphd on Nov 8, 2024 5:06:52 GMT -6
Yep, expandable up to 32 ch I/o adda
|
|
|
Post by Dan on Nov 8, 2024 8:15:45 GMT -6
Apogee is probably the best sounding thing you listed but only the Symphony II is expandable and can have more than ten inputs.
Otherwise for a little bit more money, there’s the Lynx Aurora (N), the DAD AX64 and AX Center, Dante setups, Metric Halo is currently on sale, and an RME setup with external converters but RME doesn’t make a multichannel converter as good as their ADI-2 Pro or what I listed in this post. Their Firefaces are a step down with worse line amplifiers and phase shifted top end.
|
|
|
Post by thehightenor on Nov 8, 2024 8:26:14 GMT -6
I like the Aurora N - I wish they did a unit with built in ADAT and TRS output (I know not going to happen) In the UK the added ADAT and a patch bay system to handle the DB25 output would run me to about $6,000! These days, fortunately modern converters have reached a point I feel able to put features first. I was listening to a Focusrite Clarrett octa pre though my rig a few weeks ago someone brought in. Clean as whistle - smooth top end - I was pleasantly surprised toggling between the Clarret and the excellent converters in my Crane Song Avocet. Go back 20 years budget converters were terrible!
|
|
|
Post by doubledog on Nov 8, 2024 8:26:42 GMT -6
Of course there are plenty of other considerations: connectivity, software integration, failure rates, planned obsolescence ala Apogee. for me, connectivity and OS support was one of the biggest driving factors. If you look at the specs (dynamics range, THD, SNR, etc) of most modern interfaces/converters (anything in the last 10 years that was not prosumer level) they are all so good that any differences are probably not detectable... of course there will always be someone that says they can hear it (but maybe not always in a blind test so YMMV). The Apollo 16 I had spec'd out pretty good; the Orion 32+ is even better. They both sound great to me - but really I don't hear a "sound" and that's what I wanted/expected.
|
|
kcatthedog
Temp
Super Helpful Dude
Posts: 16,024
Member is Online
|
Post by kcatthedog on Nov 8, 2024 8:33:47 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by thehightenor on Nov 8, 2024 8:38:29 GMT -6
I’d have to buy though a dealer here in the UK - the price with ADAT added is massive. We pay approximately an extra 33% on USA gear! I already payed a small fortune for my Avovet and HEDD 192. The Ferrofish gear in the UK is very reasonably priced - thank goodness!
|
|
kcatthedog
Temp
Super Helpful Dude
Posts: 16,024
Member is Online
|
Post by kcatthedog on Nov 8, 2024 9:12:00 GMT -6
Cry me a river, I already offered to help, but no, I’m not your cuppa tea!
|
|
|
Post by Dan on Nov 8, 2024 9:37:45 GMT -6
I like the Aurora N - I wish they did a unit with built in ADAT and TRS output (I know not going to happen) In the UK the added ADAT and a patch bay system to handle the DB25 output would run me to about $6,000! These days, fortunately modern converters have reached a point I feel able to put features first. I was listening to a Focusrite Clarrett octa pre though my rig a few weeks ago someone brought in. Clean as whistle - smooth top end - I was pleasantly surprised toggling between the Clarret and the excellent converters in my Crane Song Avocet. Go back 20 years budget converters were terrible! Focusrite voices their current stuff to hide detail, uses a ton of junky parts, doesn’t give a f about heat, and has a phase shifted top end. Even the rednets sound like that.
|
|
|
Post by Dan on Nov 8, 2024 9:47:59 GMT -6
Of course there are plenty of other considerations: connectivity, software integration, failure rates, planned obsolescence ala Apogee. for me, connectivity and OS support was one of the biggest driving factors. If you look at the specs (dynamics range, THD, SNR, etc) of most modern interfaces/converters (anything in the last 10 years that was not prosumer level) they are all so good that any differences are probably not detectable... of course there will always be someone that says they can hear it (but maybe not always in a blind test so YMMV). The Apollo 16 I had spec'd out pretty good; the Orion 32+ is even better. They both sound great to me - but really I don't hear a "sound" and that's what I wanted/expected. they frequently put prosumer circuits, pushing cheap, old, hot opamps hard in pro branded devices. Some of these companies like RME and UAD straddle the line and others like Apogee make a lot of plastic hifi crap like the boom, groove, zoom, whatever. The pro stuff like dad, lynx, etc costs a lot more, has newer circuitry because it’s cleaner, cooler, and heart is the archenemy of electronics. There’s also pro stuff that rips off prosumer stuff and misses the point like the sound devices mix pre was a clone of the zoom recorders but they added another gain stage to reduce noise and distortion but it still doesn’t sound great and unlike the zoom isn’t practical to use on battery life. Don’t even mention digico
|
|
|
Post by thehightenor on Nov 8, 2024 9:50:41 GMT -6
Cry me a river, I already offered to help, but no, I’m not your cuppa tea!
|
|
|
Post by tonycamphd on Nov 8, 2024 10:32:48 GMT -6
My understanding, converter chips haven’t changed much in the past 10 years, I believe the pcm4222 and the pcm1794’s were hitting a 129db dr and s/n ratio already, it’s the implementation around those chips, audio path and psu config that make the difference, a lot of high channel count multi converters sound flat, literally, the lynx n is the one I bought for that reason, well designed around the converter chips I have 24 custom dacs that feed my console and every 4 channels has its own (every other) linear psu, 6 total, the audio paths are built to the nth degree, op amps are ultra low noise high speed and require heat sink cooling, expenses no manufacturer would take on, the sound is awesome and still ahead of my lynx dacs imo(haven’t used my new lynx enough to be ultra confident in that claim, early impression), the new reality of owning the lynx is I wouldn’t be distraught if my custom stuff fried, I’d be bummed but not devastated, aka Lynx n is pretty awesome
|
|
|
Post by ironinthepath on Nov 8, 2024 10:53:33 GMT -6
I chose the MOTU 828 based on my general experience with modern MOTU converters - I prefer my Lynx Aurora (n) for sure, but they're definitely not bad. I don't have any experience with the other options though, so don't put too much weight on that vote. -Chris
|
|
|
Post by christopher on Nov 8, 2024 11:52:23 GMT -6
Apogee got me a little excited to think the desktop 2 channel symphony could be minimalist 2 channels of fancy? Trying to find the specs found some FAQ “The Symphony MK II Special Edition provides superior audio performance and thus is not comparable”… so the desktop and 2x12 is not in the same league as the premium stuff.
Also I forget that I often think about Antelope. They do sound very good I’ve done some things on them. A clear sound, I sort of forget about conversion and hear the recording. Killer price per channel.
The new MOTU uses the ESS Sabre and they talk that up in the marketing. I think ESS is in Antelope? Kinda curious about that.
|
|
|
Post by veggieryan on Nov 8, 2024 12:00:23 GMT -6
Don't sleep on the BLA Revolution EXP 8x8.
My little Revolution 2x2 still blows my mind to this day. So musical sounding.
To me its on the other end of the spectrum from the Lynx Hilo sound which always felt on the bit cold and clinical side of things to my ears.
Easily the best bang for the buck in conversion right now.
If I did not have JCF conversion I would be looking at the BLA 8x8.
|
|
kcatthedog
Temp
Super Helpful Dude
Posts: 16,024
Member is Online
|
Post by kcatthedog on Nov 8, 2024 14:15:32 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by bradd on Nov 8, 2024 15:41:43 GMT -6
Apogee Symphony MKIs are dirt cheap these days. I could hardly give mine away when I upgraded to MarkIIs.
|
|