|
Post by wiz on Oct 3, 2016 20:57:51 GMT -6
Just amazing
|
|
|
Post by jdc on Oct 7, 2016 7:55:40 GMT -6
How long until I can buy a SvartDesk?
|
|
|
Post by svart on Oct 7, 2016 8:47:14 GMT -6
How long until I can buy a SvartDesk? LOL. You know, the circuitry is really the easiest part of mixer. It's all the work that goes into implementing it correctly and at a professional quality that is the hardest part. The proper PCB layout, the integration of multiple boards across dozens of connectors and busses, the metal/wood/plastic work that would go into building a mixer.. ETC.. That's what really costs the money and takes up all the time. If someone were to seriously take on the metal/frame work and the rest of the industrial engineering aspect, some circuits could be adapted to work in it..
|
|
|
Post by svart on Oct 7, 2016 8:48:49 GMT -6
I think I might have a way to fit more pots into less space, but it's still taking up too much space. I'm about an inch over my limit right now.
I've been trying to find dual-concentric pots, but that's been pretty much impossible for the styles and values I need unless I went to full custom.
|
|
|
Post by jcoutu1 on Oct 7, 2016 9:17:25 GMT -6
Hey S, a bit off topic, but could this eq section be built as an 8 channel standalone unit? 3 rackspaces or so for 8 channels? I bet you could sell a bunch of SSL style eq's if the price was right.
|
|
|
Post by svart on Oct 7, 2016 9:31:09 GMT -6
Hey S, a bit off topic, but could this eq section be built as an 8 channel standalone unit? 3 rackspaces or so for 8 channels? I bet you could sell a bunch of SSL style eq's if the price was right. It wouldn't be *pure* SSL. The mid bands are different on my intended design. I'm also waffling on the idea of trying to put a generic preamp in this channel, and that would have to also be on the EQ board. Since I never use board preamps, I'm leaning towards not using a preamp at all.. But yeah since I'm going the separate-card route, I guess someone could wire up a handful of these in a rack case, but it'd be more like 3-4 of them in the box since I'm looking at barely fitting the EQ section in an 8" board length..
|
|
|
Post by jcoutu1 on Oct 7, 2016 9:34:46 GMT -6
Hey S, a bit off topic, but could this eq section be built as an 8 channel standalone unit? 3 rackspaces or so for 8 channels? I bet you could sell a bunch of SSL style eq's if the price was right. It wouldn't be *pure* SSL. The mid bands are different on my intended design. I'm also waffling on the idea of trying to put a generic preamp in this channel, and that would have to also be on the EQ board. Since I never use board preamps, I'm leaning towards not using a preamp at all.. But yeah since I'm going the separate-card route, I guess someone could wire up a handful of these in a rack case, but it'd be more like 3-4 of them in the box since I'm looking at barely fitting the EQ section in an 8" board length.. 8 cards wide, 5RU tall!
|
|
|
Post by svart on Oct 7, 2016 13:28:19 GMT -6
So I finally put power to the board.. I have signal through the audio path! Looks nice and clean. Now I need to figure out how to test and calibrate the other portions of the control circuit though..
|
|
|
Post by wiz on Oct 7, 2016 13:59:20 GMT -6
I always thought (and still do) a 8 channel ADAT IO EQ with Inserts would do well, though maybe more so a couple of years back due to sample rate restrictions... but I thought there were a lot of virgin ADAT IOs sitting on interfaces out there...
cheers
Wiz
|
|
|
Post by svart on Oct 7, 2016 14:35:02 GMT -6
Compression seems to work, but gate doesn't work at all. Need to continue troubleshooting..
|
|
|
Post by svart on Oct 7, 2016 15:37:34 GMT -6
So the gate/expander does work, but at very low levels. I'm not sure why this is, or if it's normal. I'll need to dig up the compressor calibration documents and see if it's normal or not.
|
|
|
Post by jin167 on Oct 8, 2016 9:34:50 GMT -6
fascinating stuff. keep us updated on your custom channel strip. Might even end up placing an order for one if svart ever decides to go commercial hope it looks good. Throw in a couple of VU meters!
|
|
|
Post by svart on Oct 11, 2016 12:01:04 GMT -6
So I got a few minutes to test the board again. I got both compression and gate working. It seems it's very finicky about the transistor that is used on each sidechain to drive the meter section. Since the BC184 is EOL, I needed to find a replacement. Seems that MPSA18 and BC547/BC550 both work well in this spot.
Now I'll need to hook up some connectors and power supply and see about listening through it before I go building a second one.
|
|
|
Post by svart on Oct 11, 2016 13:11:47 GMT -6
I also think I've figured out a better way to hook up the pots for the EQ, although I'm still running short of space.
|
|
|
Post by svart on Oct 11, 2016 13:13:21 GMT -6
One more thing.. I was looking at some other "clones" of the 4k channel compressor.. And one that was being sold in DIY form a few years ago has a crucial error in the schematic..
|
|
|
Post by pope on Oct 12, 2016 10:40:43 GMT -6
One more thing.. I was looking at some other "clones" of the 4k channel compressor.. And one that was being sold in DIY form a few years ago has a crucial error in the schematic.. Wanna be more specific?
|
|
|
Post by svart on Oct 12, 2016 15:27:47 GMT -6
One more thing.. I was looking at some other "clones" of the 4k channel compressor.. And one that was being sold in DIY form a few years ago has a crucial error in the schematic.. Wanna be more specific? Nah, i don't need to be. I don't think the product is being produced anymore. it's one of those that popped up, a few people bought it, and it died a quick death.
|
|
|
Post by pope on Oct 12, 2016 15:31:05 GMT -6
OK fair enough.
|
|
|
Post by svart on Jun 8, 2018 8:28:04 GMT -6
So I've been revisiting this lately.
I FINALLY wired up one of my compressor boards to try it out, and it does! I'm not sure how to calibrate it exactly, so I'll have to figure that out.
I did finally complete the smaller version of the compressor board, shrinking it from 6" to 5". I also did a 2" I/O board but I'm running out of space very quickly so I might have to integrate it into the EQ board.
So I have 23.5" to combine the compressor, EQ and routing boards. The routing board is what I've been spending time on lately. It needs to have 4 stereo AUX sends, pan for both the large and small faders and assign switches for the large and small faders.
I want to do something slightly different for the small fader assignment. Currently it's for monitoring (which I don't use the console for), so it is a separate path for most of the channel strip, but I want to make it a parallel path with the large fader so that I can assign it to a bus for parallel compression, etc. It's an easy thing electrically to do, but a hard thing mechanically since space is limited.
The issue is that the pots are 12mm pots, so I could put them very close together at around 96mm/3.8" total distance from end to end, but at that point you can't get your fingers between the knobs! Spacing them with another 8mm between them makes it reasonable, but then the length goes to 160mm/6.3" which eats up way too much room.
I think the best option is to stagger them with one on one side of the PCB and the next one on the other, but with only 1.5" of width to work in, I can't because that configuration is 1-3/4" not counting the extra space for mounting..
So I'm working on an idea to have cutouts along the edge of the PCB to fit the staggered pots more tightly, and then use secondary daughter PCBs to attach those pots to the main PCB..
|
|
|
Post by svart on Jun 12, 2018 8:53:58 GMT -6
I'm still unsure of how to get all of this to fit. Right now I have 23.5" of length to work with. Currently that breaks down to:
7.5" for EQ which is the bare minimum for 5" for compressor 11" for AUX sends, parallel routing and pan, main pan and routing.
The EQ needs 12 discrete pots in one form, or 10 in another form with concentric pots taken from the original console. 12 pots needs 7.5" in the most compact arrangement without any other considerations like switches. 10 pots could be down to around 6.5" in the most basic form.
The compressor is already as compact as it can possibly be.
The main board needs at least 11 pots. 6 for panning, 1 for small fader level, 4 for aux level. It also needs to hold 8 routing switches, 2 mute switches. This needs roughly 7.5" just for the pots, then another 5.2 for the large fader and assign switches, which makes 11" a few inches short of what I need to do all this..
|
|
|
Post by guitfiddler on Jun 12, 2018 20:35:45 GMT -6
I'm following this thread!
|
|
|
Post by svart on Jun 13, 2018 7:53:15 GMT -6
So some more measurements and such..
If I use the concentric pots from my current console in the EQ midrange, I can pick up another 1.125".. Still not enough.
However, I think I need to re-evaluate what it is that I want.
So the vast majority of the space on the AUX/Assign/master card is taken up with wanting 4 stereo AUX sends for my hardware reverbs. That's 8x pots in either L/R level or level and pan configurations. Even in a staggered orientation, that's 5.125 of length. The large fader is 5" from end to end, and I cannot place the fader and a pot next to each other, so the only thing I can have next to the fader are switches. That's fine, as I have 12 switches for assign and mutes which take up around 5.5" anyway.
I also need 1 pot for small fader level, 1 for small fader pan and 1 for main pan.
The current console channel has a true small fader, but even then the width is still slightly too wide to use next to a pot on the board.
So my options are:
1) Redo the compressor board once again with the pots staggered to pick up 1 more inch and make that card only 4" wide.. This requires adding headers and making small daughter PCBS to mount the pots "upside down". I'm going to have to do this for the EQ anyway, so I could make a generic version for everything..
2) Rethink my AUX sending and instead of pots have switches to assign L/R since most of my work will be either 100% L or R or stereo. I rarely pan the sends other than fully L or fully R or full stereo, so if I do this, and place the switches on the back of the board opposite to the level pot and have staggered pots, I can almost half the distance at around 3", but I add complexity in the form of the small daughter PCBs needed for the switches and staggered pots. Doing this without the staggering only increases this to around 3.25" with a little of that being larger gaps between the pots for my fingers..
3) I could also do something drastic and build a second box for just large faders and such to sit in front of my console, that way I have the whole length of the channel to do all the other stuff.. But that seems complex and expensive.
I'd rather compromise on the AUX sends than do so on the EQ or compressor at this point.
Also, this design doesn't have a preamp at all. I never use the console preamps.. Although it might be nice to get a little space to add a simple preamps like the THAT preamp just in case.
One more idea I'm kicking around is doing VCA control for the main fader. Essentially the main fader would be just a controller for a micro and a ADC/DAC for that channel. I can get super cheap small ADC and DACs to interface with a microcontroller, and create a digital bus inside the board for future use as channel automation. This iteration would simply mirror the value on the fader to the VCA. That's the easy part. The hard part would be to later create some kind of external control that could sync to a DAW somehow and use the drawn automation to control it. I certainly don't want to reinvent the wheel here though.
|
|
|
Post by svart on Jun 15, 2018 14:31:43 GMT -6
I've been thinking about this and I might have come up with a viable solution..
So the whole reason I've been having issues is that I was trying to stick with 16mm pots because they're cheap and easy to get for the most part. This also limits the mechanical dimensions of what I can do!
So, I was looking for options for the EQ section and I came to find that Mouser stocks 4 gang 50K anti-log(reverse log, or reverse audio) pots in 9mm size for 3$ a piece.. This is crazy because this is basically finding gold.
The HPF and HF and LF EQ sections use 3 instances of double AND triple gang 47K anti-log pots, which are NOT available without special order (15 week lead times, 200pcs minimum order $$$$), so finding a quad part that I can essentially buy in bulk to get the prices down to around 2$ each..
And the whole thing that led me to this was that I wanted to see if there were dual 9mm pots available.
So, I CAN fit a 9mm pot on the backside of the PCB while a 16mm pot sits on the opposite side, with 1/16th of an inch to spare.
9mm pots also barely clear the fader if I place the fader to the very edge of the channel strip too.
I'll need to mock up some things to see how I can get everything to fit though.
|
|
|
Post by guitfiddler on Jun 15, 2018 16:24:24 GMT -6
I've been thinking about this and I might have come up with a viable solution.. So the whole reason I've been having issues is that I was trying to stick with 16mm pots because they're cheap and easy to get for the most part. This also limits the mechanical dimensions of what I can do! So, I was looking for options for the EQ section and I came to find that Mouser stocks 4 gang 50K anti-log(reverse log, or reverse audio) pots in 9mm size for 3$ a piece.. This is crazy because this is basically finding gold. The HPF and HF and LF EQ sections use 3 instances of double AND triple gang 47K anti-log pots, which are NOT available without special order (15 week lead times, 200pcs minimum order $$$$), so finding a quad part that I can essentially buy in bulk to get the prices down to around 2$ each.. And the whole thing that led me to this was that I wanted to see if there were dual 9mm pots available. So, I CAN fit a 9mm pot on the backside of the PCB while a 16mm pot sits on the opposite side, with 1/16th of an inch to spare. 9mm pots also barely clear the fader if I place the fader to the very edge of the channel strip too. I'll need to mock up some things to see how I can get everything to fit though. My goodness! A mixer that sounds great in front of my interface for live tracking with all the basic necessities with a Pro sound? This is exactly what I've been looking for all these years. I just can't be satisfied with all the budget mixers, they all sound like dookie!
|
|
|
Post by svart on Jun 15, 2018 17:09:58 GMT -6
I've been thinking about this and I might have come up with a viable solution.. So the whole reason I've been having issues is that I was trying to stick with 16mm pots because they're cheap and easy to get for the most part. This also limits the mechanical dimensions of what I can do! So, I was looking for options for the EQ section and I came to find that Mouser stocks 4 gang 50K anti-log(reverse log, or reverse audio) pots in 9mm size for 3$ a piece.. This is crazy because this is basically finding gold. The HPF and HF and LF EQ sections use 3 instances of double AND triple gang 47K anti-log pots, which are NOT available without special order (15 week lead times, 200pcs minimum order $$$$), so finding a quad part that I can essentially buy in bulk to get the prices down to around 2$ each.. And the whole thing that led me to this was that I wanted to see if there were dual 9mm pots available. So, I CAN fit a 9mm pot on the backside of the PCB while a 16mm pot sits on the opposite side, with 1/16th of an inch to spare. 9mm pots also barely clear the fader if I place the fader to the very edge of the channel strip too. I'll need to mock up some things to see how I can get everything to fit though. My goodness! A mixer that sounds great in front of my interface for live tracking with all the basic necessities with a Pro sound? This is exactly what I've been looking for all these years. I just can't be satisfied with all the budget mixers, they all sound like dookie! Man I love your enthusiasm but unfortunately this isn't a complete mixer it's just a channel strip for my existing mixer, an Alesis X2. It's stealing a lot of the best stuff from other designs, so only some of it is my design.
|
|