|
Post by Ward on Mar 7, 2019 8:14:35 GMT -6
Especially when everybody lies. Even Proud Regressives.
|
|
ericn
Temp
Balance Engineer
Posts: 16,083
|
Post by ericn on Mar 7, 2019 9:17:03 GMT -6
Especially when everybody lies. Even Proud Regressives. Hate to quote the man but “both sides,both sides.” The problem is we have a system that has become centered on the political battles not solving the problems. Both sides are driven by the money of the 1% ( I’ll admit last time I checked my household falls in the 2%) not the majority. Everybody rushes to defend their rich bad guys till they find out they are true scum. Hell Bernie had to fly on chartered jets.
|
|
|
Post by johneppstein on Mar 7, 2019 13:20:35 GMT -6
I have hope for Beto.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 7, 2019 14:39:10 GMT -6
Just watched first half, just confirmed my suspicions all along, and in that case, I wholeheartedly agree with the title of this thread. May he rot in hell, and indeed it will make me consider not playing his music in my home or studio ever again.
|
|
|
Post by Bob Olhsson on Mar 7, 2019 20:38:30 GMT -6
I recorded a tiny lyric change in one of Michael's vocals for the first J5 album. I remember feeling profoundly sorry for him because of his father's vibe. Unfortunately the abused often become the abusers later on in life.
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Mar 8, 2019 13:56:46 GMT -6
I recorded a tiny lyric change in one of Michael's vocals for the first J5 album. I remember feeling profoundly sorry for him because of his father's vibe. Unfortunately the abused often become the abusers later on in life. Yeah...poor kid learned it from somewhere.
|
|
|
Post by Bob Olhsson on Mar 8, 2019 15:24:31 GMT -6
It is often part of a chain of behavior that extends across many generations. It would be nice if the people covering this stuff explained it better instead of all of the sensationalism. I used to record conferences for a friend in San Francisco and some of them were about child abuse.
|
|
|
Post by svart on Mar 8, 2019 16:10:13 GMT -6
I knew someone who in the late 90's worked at a big studio that MJ would occasionally record at. Apparently they'd build a full garage around the back of the building and full-height dividers down the hallways so that MJ could come in and walk down the hallways separate from everyone else and would never "be bothered" by people working there. Supposedly they worked extremely odd hours for MJ sessions and nobody ever knew when/if MJ was around.
The story I heard goes that one of the people who worked in the studio needed to get something from an area of the studio that was off-limits due to the MJ lockout but they decided that they didn't think a session was happening at that time of day/night. This person decided to sneak through the dividers and accidentally walked in on someone doing vocals in one of the B/C studios. The story also goes that this person was singing exactly like MJ, but was not MJ.
The rest of the story is supposedly that this employee had gotten in huge trouble and was made to sign a non-disclosure agreement about the incident, but the explanation was that the singer was just "warming up" to do background vocals.
Completely hearsay though.
Lots of hearsay over the years that supposedly the later albums were effectively manufactured by the producers and that MJ had very little to do with writing or singing on them because he was so doped up and/or mentally ill.
I told this story because I think it's interesting and deplorable that his (alleged) lifestyle was probably catered to by his handlers, and his misdeeds also hidden so that others could capitalize on his name for as long as possible.
|
|
|
Post by Bob Olhsson on Mar 9, 2019 17:36:41 GMT -6
I don't know, that kind of hearsay pops up around everyone at the top of the charts. I've compared notes with a lot of people and we've all agreed that as far as people we've actually worked with are concerned, far more has been BS than not.
No artist will turn down a gig which has led to a lot of insane touring schedules which in turn have led to a lot of drug use. Michael is far from the only one having that problem. I hope it woke a few people up.
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Mar 14, 2019 23:52:23 GMT -6
But he also had sec with young children. Which was not cool.
|
|
|
Post by the other mark williams on Apr 10, 2019 0:05:18 GMT -6
Honest question here, is it right that radio stations are banning Michael Jackson songs and cutting him from their playlists? I'm not sure how I feel about this. I've been trying to reconcile the fact that bad people do good things, and good people do bad things. Can you enjoy someones art but hate them personally? I dont know... I can understand the sentiment behind cutting his music from playlists, but that's a slippery slope, no? I mean think of all the great music we enjoy, and then think about all the reprehensible things those musicians and rock stars have done. From drug addiction, to sleeping with underage girls, to incest, to adopting 13 year old groupie's so they come on tour and continue their illicit affairs. Not sure the answer here. Thoughts? These are very good questions. Here are three different pieces I read back in March that all deal with the complexities around "cancelling" someone's art due to their behavior. They're all interesting reads. The first one actually mentions the other two in hyperlinks. First is "Can the Music of Michael Jackson and R. Kelly be Canceled?" on The Ringer.
Next is "It's Too Late to Cancel Michael Jackson" on SlateAnd last is "Can we still listen to Michael Jackson? We wouldn't need 'cancel culture' if we had justice culture" on Salon.I think all three articles bring up valid points-of-view.
|
|
|
Post by yotonic on Apr 10, 2019 15:33:23 GMT -6
Humans are fundamentally ignorant. It takes a ton of time and work not to be. It's a lifetime struggle.
I agree that many of the "same people" (hope that's not racist) that believed Smollett are the ones that don't believe or accept these assertions about Jackson. But at the same time I ABSOLUTELY see this same behavior in acquaintances of mine who completely stick their head in the sand regarding Donald Trump. A guy who has displayed really, really bad personal behavior on the record that might not include outright pedophilia but definitely includes victimizing younger women. Everything from grabbing their private parts, to walking into young contestants dressing rooms, to pinning other young women against walls and feeling them up etc. For some reason, no matter how reprehensible his personal behavior is "his fans" and some of his voters make all sorts of excuses and rationalizations for it.
My point is that this sort of refusal to accept facts and upsetting news about our celebrities happens throughout society.
|
|
|
Post by mrholmes on Apr 12, 2019 16:50:33 GMT -6
I am not surprised at all that MJ did it too.
But it happens everyday!!
Most often in families. Dads who rape thier daughters / sons. Grandpas do it too. Even Mothers do it with boys and girls.
Teachers... the Priest...the Coach...the Pop Star.... etc.
I know what I am talking about my father was a Gynocologist for 35 years. If you work in a big Hospital everyday parents try to tell you bullshit about what happend to thier kids.
The problem ist not only the sick rapist (true its a disorder) but also a lot of people which are close to the family/kids just dont want to see it. A lot of parents hold the perfect family picture up to the outside world.
Raping childs - I have no wrods for what I feel.
But even the roman catholic church is not able to name it in thier own rows.
I just cant freak out about MJ. The problem is bigger than we think.
|
|
|
Post by christopher on Jun 2, 2019 11:43:01 GMT -6
I have to revisit this because my last comment was about as negative as could be, and it just doesn’t sit well with me. I can’t help to love the art he made. His skill and mastery is timeless, and even more tragic knowing there was an internal battle of good versus evil, mental illness and his outward character of extreme generosity and goodwill was probably an attempt to make amends for his sick acts. I’ve decided I have to separate the art from evil, mainly because if I didn’t, I’d be forced to hate the advancements Germany made in microphones and recording. So I’d have to say the invention of biasing tape was at the benefit from being evil, and the same can be said for Neumann and Studer products. Without evil would they exist? Without MJ being abused, even if just by being forced to be a young superstar, the art wouldn’t exist. If MJ didn’t do evil things in private, he would have been a damn near angel on earth. He never talked shit about anyone in public, only forgave people, probably because he knew he needed forgiveness. Just a sad situation. Still unforgivable, but what great art the teams made, so that’s what I’ll remember. I’ll try to listen to early MJ, pre BAD era.. and just tell myself he wasn’t a nutball yet.
..edit: here’s a better old recording sopposedly direct from tape no processing:
|
|
|
Post by Tbone81 on Jun 2, 2019 11:52:11 GMT -6
After some thought I think I’ve reconciled the dilemma with this: Good people do bad things, and Bad people do good things.
It’s a hard truth to grapple with sometimes, but I’m not going to torment myself for enjoying a rerun of the Cosby show, or for watching an old Louie CK stand up, or for listening to Thriller.
|
|
|
Post by yotonic on Jun 2, 2019 19:00:13 GMT -6
Ya James Jamerson...... holy hell.
|
|
|
Post by matt@IAA on Jun 2, 2019 19:48:25 GMT -6
After some thought I think I’ve reconciled the dilemma with this: Good people do bad things, and Bad people do good things. It’s a hard truth to grapple with sometimes, but I’m not going to torment myself for enjoying a rerun of the Cosby show, or for watching an old Louie CK stand up, or for listening to Thriller. Like Alexander Solzhenitsyn said...”If only it were all so simple! If only there were evil people somewhere insidiously committing evil deeds, and it were necessary only to separate them from the rest of us and destroy them. But the line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being. And who is willing to destroy a piece of his own heart?”
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 8, 2019 20:27:04 GMT -6
Bob O. brought up a very important point on the topic. Child abuse starts *in the family*, in the direct environment, by someone the children *have to* trust to survive, in the absolute majority of cases, and then can lead to an avalanche of abuse and/of violence. I guess it is a mere american phenomenon that people fear the rapist, the child abuser, the kidnapper as a stranger that is somewhere out there. This is by far the smallest percentage of cases. Best everyone can do, is stopping circles of abuse and violence against kids. Early. The year I was born, around 70% of the adults saw beating children as a probate tool of education. Although in my country children have the right of beeing raised without physical or psychical violence, and there has been an explicit law installed in 2000, that banned violence in education and makes perfectly clear, that no kind of violence against kids is legal, I still can hear these mindless sentences like "One slap did not do harm to anyone ever". Which is perfect BS. It does. Physically and psychically. If everyone would speak out clearly when he sees violence against children, the world would be a much better place. This is not a private thing, it is in everyones interest. Keeping children strong, letting them be clear about what they want to do and what they don't, raising them to self-confident and self-conscious human beeings that are allowed to say "no" if they do not want something, is by far the best thing everyone can do against child abuse. That's my 2 cent on the topic.
|
|
|
Post by johneppstein on Jul 8, 2019 21:21:42 GMT -6
Especially when everybody lies. Even Proud Regressives. When every national news outlet in the country save one and every other major news outlet in the world says the same thing, as well as every established fact checker agrees, who's lying?
|
|
|
Post by johneppstein on Jul 8, 2019 21:26:55 GMT -6
Bob O. brought up a very important point on the topic. Child abuse starts *in the family*, in the direct environment, by someone the children *have to* trust to survive, in the absolute majority of cases, and then can lead to an avalanche of abuse and/of violence. I guess it is a mere american phenomenon that people fear the rapist, the child abuser, the kidnapper as a stranger that is somewhere out there. This is by far the smallest percentage of cases. Best everyone can do, is stopping circles of abuse and violence against kids. Early. The year I was born, around 70% of the adults saw beating children as a probate tool of education. Although in my country children have the right of beeing raised without physical or psychical violence, and there has been an explicit law installed in 2000, that banned violence in education and makes perfectly clear, that no kind of violence against kids is legal, I still can hear these mindless sentences like "One slap did not do harm to anyone ever". Which is perfect BS. It does. Physically and psychically. If everyone would speak out clearly when he sees violence against children, the world would be a much better place. This is not a private thing, it is in everyones interest. Keeping children strong, letting them be clear about what they want to do and what they don't, raising them to self-confident and self-conscious human beeings that are allowed to say "no" if they do not want something, is by far the best thing everyone can do against child abuse. That's my 2 cent on the topic. I have to disagree. While I don't doubt that there's a great deal of familial sexual abuse, my own experience as a child indicates that there's a great deal that is not family related. I don't really want to elaborate on my experiences, other than to say that a lot is closely related to bullying.
I do suspect that such things within the family may be more likely to be passed on, but I have no experience with that.
|
|
|
Post by Ward on Jul 9, 2019 7:29:32 GMT -6
When every national news outlet in the country save one and every other major news outlet in the world says the same thing, as well as every established fact checker agrees, who's lying? Some might say everybody changes the story to suit their own needs. Some change the story so much that it is unrecognizable from the original. Sometimes the story changes bit by bit as it's passed around from news outlet to news outlet. Isn't that kinda sorta maybe like lying?
|
|
|
Post by johneppstein on Jul 9, 2019 12:05:34 GMT -6
When every national news outlet in the country save one and every other major news outlet in the world says the same thing, as well as every established fact checker agrees, who's lying? Some might say everybody changes the story to suit their own needs. Some change the story so much that it is unrecognizable from the original. Sometimes the story changes bit by bit as it's passed around from news outlet to news outlet. Isn't that kinda sorta maybe like lying? Lying is a deliberate act. To my knowledge there is only one major US "news" outlet that engages in such conduct.
Another tell is when they, or the subject of the news, repeatedly contradicts themselves over time. I'm not talking about issuing a correction I'm talking about changing their story and pretending that nothing happened.
When you cross-correlate a number of traditionally respected sources you can usually get at the truth.
Also when you watch original source, for example congressional hearings, and pay attention to who is asking pointed questions and who is simply obfuscating and generating red herrings.
|
|
|
Post by johneppstein on Jul 9, 2019 12:14:00 GMT -6
When every national news outlet in the country save one and every other major news outlet in the world says the same thing, as well as every established fact checker agrees, who's lying? Some might say everybody changes the story to suit their own needs. Some change the story so much that it is unrecognizable from the original. Sometimes the story changes bit by bit as it's passed around from news outlet to news outlet. Isn't that kinda sorta maybe like lying? Some might say that, yes. It's most often criminals who fall back on the "everybody does it" excuse. That's actually Psychology 101.
If somebody is constantly hollering about "fake news" you can usually be pretty certain that they're engaging in what psychologists call "transference", when a perpetrator attempts to divert scrutiny by claiming that everybody else is doing the type of bad acts that they themselves engage in on a regular basis. Again, Psychology 101.
|
|
|
Post by Ward on Jul 9, 2019 16:58:48 GMT -6
Some might say everybody changes the story to suit their own needs. Some change the story so much that it is unrecognizable from the original. Sometimes the story changes bit by bit as it's passed around from news outlet to news outlet. Isn't that kinda sorta maybe like lying? Lying is a deliberate act. To my knowledge there is only one major US "news" outlet that engages in such conduct. CNN?
|
|
|
Post by johneppstein on Jul 9, 2019 17:35:58 GMT -6
Lying is a deliberate act. To my knowledge there is only one major US "news" outlet that engages in such conduct. CNN? Faux. I can't watch them for more than 5 minutes or so, the dissembling is so pervasive and obvious. They're not a news outlet, they're unrepentant propagandists. Of course that shouldn't be news to anyone who has followed the career of Rupert Murdock for any length of time.
For some weird reason my cable box occasionally switches to them at random times without any human input and by the time I notice (I have the TV going constantly while using the computer*) I'm always yelling at the TV. Does AT&T have some clandestine connection to Fox "news"? Why does it always switch to that one channel and nothing else?
* - the general purpose machine. The studio computer is in a different room and usually not connected to the outside world.
|
|