|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Oct 31, 2020 20:26:00 GMT -6
Oh my goodness. Might be one of my favorites I've ever had.
|
|
|
|
Post by jacobamerritt on Nov 1, 2020 11:52:58 GMT -6
Dude, its amazing... Ever tried the 1920? Might be my favorite Old Forester thats easy to find.
|
|
|
|
Post by jeremygillespie on Nov 1, 2020 13:59:18 GMT -6
Right now It’s my favorite as well. I’ve got a 4 bottle stockpile I like it so much. They are definitely doing things right at Old Forrester!
|
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Nov 8, 2020 18:25:22 GMT -6
Dude, its amazing... Ever tried the 1920? Might be my favorite Old Forester thats easy to find. Might have to try the 1920 next. A friend I trust seems to like the 1910 better. |
|
|
|
Post by jacobamerritt on Nov 9, 2020 13:41:25 GMT -6
Might have to try the 1920 next. A friend I trust seems to like the 1910 better. Both seem to be a bit better after sitting open for a couple weeks as well. 1920 went from pretty forgettable to a favorite. The 1910 is definitely one of the better 'double oaked' whiskeys in my opinion. |
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Dec 3, 2020 22:29:45 GMT -6
Wow. The 1897 might even be better. Wish I had them side by side.
|
|
|
|
Post by jsteiger on Dec 13, 2020 19:06:10 GMT -6
I had the 1920 last night and sipping the 1910 now. At first tonight I thought the 1920 was my preference. After a little while here I'm starting to think I dunno, maybe I like the 1910?...The proof difference is definitely noticeable. I only have a couple of fingers worth. Just a light and mild buzz. Definitely not trying to get fucked up.
|
|
|
|
Post by jacobamerritt on Dec 14, 2020 12:26:04 GMT -6
I had the 1920 last night and sipping the 1910 now. At first tonight I thought the 1920 was my preference. After a little while here I'm starting to think I dunno, maybe I like the 1910?...The proof difference is definitely noticeable. I only have a couple of fingers worth. Just a light and mild buzz. Definitely not trying to get fucked up. 1910 definitely improved for me after it was opened for a couple weeks, and oxidized a touch to mellow the oak |
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Jan 31, 2021 22:07:40 GMT -6
This is still my favorite.
|
|
|
|
Post by forgotteng on Jul 6, 2021 16:04:48 GMT -6
I really enjoyed the 100 proof. I need to work my way up to the 1910.
|
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Jul 6, 2021 21:15:26 GMT -6
I really enjoyed the 100 proof. I need to work my way up to the 1910. Think you’re thinking of the 1920. Believe the 1910 is 94 proof. Think my tastes are evolving. Hadn’t had 1910 for a couple of months because I had one i thought was meh. So, i bought another one several weeks ago. Not at all the experience i had the first time i tried it. Most likely because Ive had better bourbons since and just like anything - the more you do it - the more knowledge you have. It’s a good bottle. A little pricey for what you get for $55+. If it were $40 I think it would be a really good buy. Kindve has a banana thing to me - which is weird because it’s like the only one I think that about. I’m finding it kind of short on the palate and less complex than some more established bottles. Like slightly less refined - and it drinks like it’s a higher proof than it is. |
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Jul 6, 2021 21:15:54 GMT -6
I had the 1920 last night and sipping the 1910 now. At first tonight I thought the 1920 was my preference. After a little while here I'm starting to think I dunno, maybe I like the 1910?...The proof difference is definitely noticeable. I only have a couple of fingers worth. Just a light and mild buzz. Definitely not trying to get fucked up. 1910 definitely improved for me after it was opened for a couple weeks, and oxidized a touch to mellow the oak This might be right on the nose. |
|
|
|
Post by forgotteng on Jul 7, 2021 4:20:01 GMT -6
I really enjoyed the 100 proof. I need to work my way up to the 1910. Think you’re thinking of the 1920. Believe the 1910 is 94 proof. Think my tastes are evolving. Hadn’t had 1910 for a couple of months because I had one i thought was meh. So, i bought another one several weeks ago. Not at all the experience i had the first time i tried it. Most likely because Ive had better bourbons since and just like anything - the more you do it - the more knowledge you have. It’s a good bottle. A little pricey for what you get for $55+. If it were $40 I think it would be a really good buy. Kindve has a banana thing to me - which is weird because it’s like the only one I think that about. I’m finding it kind of short on the palate and less complex than some more established bottles. Like slightly less refined - and it drinks like it’s a higher proof than it is.  This is the one I had. It's the entry level. Runs about 23$ a bottle. I don't see the 1910 much in PA for some reason. |
|
|
|
Post by professorplum on Jul 7, 2021 23:08:17 GMT -6
Another vote here for the "Prohibition" 1920 bottle. Haven't tried the 1910 yet but holy s**t I love the 1920!
|
|
|
|
Post by Ward on Jul 8, 2021 5:34:41 GMT -6
Definitely not trying to get fucked up. I meant to comment back in '20 "Not trying to" but if it happens, it happens? That's like me and Velvet old-fashionds . . . it just happens at the end of a long session, late at night. |
|
