|
Post by chessparov on Nov 3, 2024 13:44:24 GMT -6
Meaning “our own” as Singers. Usually “Nada” (as in nothing” Eric LOL! ). Why? Am starting to understand over-listening to your Voice… Live and/or Recording. Can be Hazardous to your Track’s eventual health. IMHO listening to a backing Headphone Mix is normally better, minus your Voice! (Obviously pre-Recordings of your Voice if you’re singing over them OK though) More on the “Why’s” if there’s some interest as to Why. * Chris *Am presupposing the Singer is at least Half Decent here BTW. Including mic technique. Hopefully better!
|
|
|
Post by thehightenor on Nov 3, 2024 13:52:34 GMT -6
Meaning “our own” as Singers. Usually “Nada” (as in nothing” Eric LOL! ). Why? Am starting to understand over-listening to your Voice… Live and/or Recording. Can be Hazardous to your Track’s eventual health. IMHO listening to a backing Headphone Mix is normally better, minus your Voice! (Obviously pre-Recordings of your Voice if you’re singing over them OK though) More on the “Why’s” if there’s some interest as to Why. * Chris *Am presupposing the Singer is at least Half Decent here BTW. Including mic technique. Hopefully better! No! Not ime. Monitoring is crucial. Well, great monitoring is crucial. The fold back vocal should be at a volume to do no more and now less that exactly compensate for the loss of air conduction by the headphones. As you take the phones on and off there should be no change in volume. Some plate reverb and a touch of delay can very much help zone in pitching as it slightly elongates a note. If it works for you …. great. For me it would be awful and not good for my vocals and vocal technique.
|
|
|
Post by christophert on Nov 3, 2024 14:56:01 GMT -6
I more than often find it is somewhere in the middle. Generally, one headphone partially off, the other headphone fully on, and a reasonable amount of voice in the headphones to have pitch grounding. The focus on the headphones are only for pitch reference maybe a little verb for vibe, and the ear without headphone monitors the performance / intensity / feel plus another pitch reference.
It is amazing how the brain can do all of this stuff simultaneously.
|
|
|
Post by chessparov on Nov 3, 2024 14:59:34 GMT -6
Hey everyone is entitled to my opinion! I still encourage some experimentation. Chris
|
|
|
Post by bossanova on Nov 3, 2024 15:17:33 GMT -6
I’ve done no vocal in sealed closed back, no vocal in open back, and no vocal in on-ear. They all have their problems, for me at least.
I’ve found that vocal in on-ear is the best mix of controlling bleed and fold-back combined with still hearing my voice in the room, at least if I’m engineering myself. I’ve never been able to make reverb work.
|
|
|
Post by chessparov on Nov 3, 2024 16:41:36 GMT -6
So far as you guys guessed... No self Vocal is usually best on me. One off/One on when needing Cans. Self listening tends to cause most Singers to tighten the Larynx somewhat. Just ask Giovanni Lamperti-Well if you had a Time Machine! Chris P.S. Hoping Bob Ohlsson chimes in.
|
|
ericn
Temp
Balance Engineer
Posts: 16,107
|
Post by ericn on Nov 3, 2024 18:10:34 GMT -6
Meaning “our own” as Singers. Usually “Nada” (as in nothing” Eric LOL! ). Why? Am starting to understand over-listening to your Voice… Live and/or Recording. Can be Hazardous to your Track’s eventual health. IMHO listening to a backing Headphone Mix is normally better, minus your Voice! (Obviously pre-Recordings of your Voice if you’re singing over them OK though) More on the “Why’s” if there’s some interest as to Why. * Chris *Am presupposing the Singer is at least Half Decent here BTW. Including mic technique. Hopefully better! When it comes to building a monitor mix for anyone the first thing you learn is build it for the artist, not what you think the artist needs/ wants. Everybody is so different. Yes it’s a major pain in the ass everyone thinks you should know what they want, but you don’t, till you twist some knobs.
|
|
|
Post by chessparov on Nov 3, 2024 18:13:19 GMT -6
Including the Hardware kind?
|
|
|
Post by Bob Olhsson on Nov 3, 2024 20:14:43 GMT -6
I did an experiment with a class I was teaching. None of the students had ever done a recording previously. We compared no vocal, vocal with one headphone off and with both on. In every case the best performance and intonation was with no vocal. I was surprised.
|
|
ericn
Temp
Balance Engineer
Posts: 16,107
|
Post by ericn on Nov 3, 2024 20:45:07 GMT -6
I did an experiment with a class I was teaching. None of the students had ever done a recording previously. We compared no vocal, vocal with one headphone off and with both on. In every case the best performance and intonation was with no vocal. I was surprised. I’m of 2 minds on this the monitor mixer is very surprised, the studio engineer is not. Of course there are those less talented and experienced vocalist, myself included, who need a guide vocal.
|
|
|
Post by chessparov on Nov 3, 2024 21:18:41 GMT -6
I did an experiment with a class I was teaching. None of the students had ever done a recording previously. We compared no vocal, vocal with one headphone off and with both on. In every case the best performance and intonation was with no vocal. I was surprised. Bingo! Reinforces my faith in the Bel Canto/Lamperti teachings. This originally was very VERY hard for me to accept. As I’ve had a strong habit of “listening to myself” Live instead. (Without headphones onstage ) Just imagine if John didn’t ever have Sir Martin… Put “Ketchup” on his vocals? Chris P.S. Really enjoying my AA X-15 Cans though. Cool for Tracking backing tracks. And casual enjoyment. For around $100.
|
|
|
Post by teejay on Nov 4, 2024 8:58:13 GMT -6
To each his own, and whatever works best for the singer. The student results Bob highlights are really interesting, but I would think a key factor there is that "None of the students had ever done a recording previously." It takes some time to get comfortable with hearing your own voice. I've been tracking myself for 20 years. At this point I would never sing without my vocal in the headphones while recording (nor sing live without hearing my own vox). For me it's all about the feel, emotion, nuance, volume, inflection, and timing that hearing yourself clearly and intimately enables. When I can hear myself against the tracking I have complete control over how my vocal is sounding in relation to the music. I believe with experience you won't overthink, rather you are freed up to hone in on what you're hearing, gaining the ability to experiment and be artistic "real time". I can hear immediately how any vocal variation sounds, helping me make decisions when practicing and solidifying what I want to do/what sounds best when recording (and for performing as well). And as thehightenor states, some effects on the vocal in the phones just enhances this experience for me. Gives me a good understanding of what the finished product will sound like. But I understand that may not be the preferred approach for everyone.
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Nov 4, 2024 9:17:53 GMT -6
I’ll often experiment with different vocal monitoring levels…kinda depends on the song and what part of the song. Depends on the emotion. How hard do I want to push? I’d imaging I’d sing loud as shit if I had no vocal…but way less vocal definitely makes me less timid. When you’re less timid there’s more air running through you and more likely to hit notes.
I’ve been wondering if there was some magic monitoring solution. High dollar feels like you’re in the room kind of thing. I’ve still never gotten the feeling I had in big studios…where you put on the headphones and it’s like they’re there in the room with you. I remember multiple times thinking I could reach out and touch the guitar player on the left. (Or whatever). It was a Mytek Private Q…which really makes me want to look into it again now that we’re talking about it.
|
|
|
Post by svart on Nov 4, 2024 9:18:54 GMT -6
I personally think that singers do better when they aren't trying to do too much. Trying to listen to their own vocals seems to trip up a lot of them and they end up turning up the vocals in the headphones to almost ear splitting volumes without much change in their delivery.
On the other hand, I find that if they can't keep a tune, I'll autotune a take and have them harmonize to themselves and it helps a LOT, mostly by taking away their need to try to think about staying in tune while also trying to deliver the performance.
|
|
|
Post by chessparov on Nov 4, 2024 12:14:17 GMT -6
I plan on including some Pitch Correction guide vocals for eventual very Low and High notes. Great idea Svart!
|
|
|
Post by thehightenor on Nov 4, 2024 12:32:39 GMT -6
Listening to your own vocal is what beginners do! Or in fact listening yourself doing anything musical is what beginners do. Experienced musicians perform and that means getting in the “zone” and when your in the “zone” you can do nothing wrong and you certainly aren’t listening to yourself on any conscious level. That’s what great monitoring allows you to achieve …. an “in the zone performance” Not having your vocal in the mix might work for a half petrified beginner (not you Chris of course
|
|
|
Post by aremos on Nov 4, 2024 13:53:39 GMT -6
1)live & studio are different - but not opposite. With IEM'S &/or floor monitors there are different approaches also. 2)The MIX you're hearing is crucial - too much voice and you hold back, too much music (band) & you overcompensate. 3)everyone is different - in my case I want my voice as low as possible where I can be relaxed & comfortable. In the studio: No FX in headphones & one ear free (w/o headphone) to get the technique working in a natural environment as possible.
|
|
|
Post by thehightenor on Nov 4, 2024 17:20:21 GMT -6
1)live & studio are different - but not opposite. With IEM'S &/or floor monitors there are different approaches also. 2)The MIX you're hearing is crucial - too much voice and you hold back, too much music (band) & you overcompensate. 3)everyone is different - in my case I want my voice as low as possible where I can be relaxed & comfortable. In the studio: No FX in headphones & one ear free (w/o headphone) to get the technique working in a natural environment as possible. I’ve changed to IEM’s live. I find they are fantastic for delivering well pitched vocals in a live environment. Mine are vented once’s and when the level and FX are set up perfectly the net effect is like I’m not wearing them. I’m now a huge fan of using them live.
|
|
|
Post by bossanova on Nov 4, 2024 20:02:09 GMT -6
I’ll often experiment with different vocal monitoring levels…kinda depends on the song and what part of the song. Depends on the emotion. How hard do I want to push? I’d imaging I’d sing loud as shit if I had no vocal…but way less vocal definitely makes me less timid. When you’re less timid there’s more air running through you and more likely to hit notes. I’ve been wondering if there was some magic monitoring solution. High dollar feels like you’re in the room kind of thing. I’ve still never gotten the feeling I had in big studios…where you put on the headphones and it’s like they’re there in the room with you. I remember multiple times thinking I could reach out and touch the guitar player on the left. (Or whatever). It was a Mytek Private Q…which really makes me want to look into it again now that we’re talking about it. I’ve had the same experience where there’s just some magic in a good studio and everything is dialed in just right. It could just be the combination of experienced ears and not self-engineering.
|
|
|
Post by drumsound on Nov 4, 2024 23:04:13 GMT -6
Thinking of this thread today as I was with a younger band where the singer had a couple of sessions on this tune that was kicking his ass. I told him I wanted to try giving him the mix without his vocal. I mention Chirs' and Bob's comments including the stuff about one ear on and one off. He had good success with both ears on, and when he went to one on, one off in the middle of a take, it kinda went south.
It was quite a breakthrough for a song that was kicking his ass until today.
|
|
|
Post by thehightenor on Nov 6, 2024 1:24:05 GMT -6
Thinking of this thread today as I was with a younger band where the singer had a couple of sessions on this tune that was kicking his ass. I told him I wanted to try giving him the mix without his vocal. I mention Chirs' and Bob's comments including the stuff about one ear on and one off. He had good success with both ears on, and when he went to one on, one off in the middle of a take, it kinda went south. It was quite a breakthrough for a song that was kicking his ass until today. People can stop stammering when they can't hear themselves .... I saw this in the film The Kings Speech - it was fascinating. I see this with young classical pianists. If I sing the tune of the piece as they play it they always play it perfectly - because they're listening to me and not themselves! One can't be creator and critic at the same time - that's like trying to drive a car with one foot on the gas and one foot on the brake. Experience comes in to help eventually, and an artist will learn to get into a performance zone and stop critically listening as they preform.
|
|
|
Post by andersmv on Nov 6, 2024 7:38:02 GMT -6
You’ve got to try everything when a vocalist has trouble, I’ve seen about every combination work differently with different artist, sometime you have to change it up for the same artist on different songs. I had a guy in here last week doing 5 songs. It was his first time in a “real” studio, but he had done demos of a few of them at home in garage band. He definitely suffered from “demo-itis” on one of the songs as he had been tweaking away on that song demo for over a year. All the other songs he completely knocked the vocals out of the park, I just had him do 4 takes through the songs and comp’ed a master from them (one song he got it on the second take and I used most of that one).
For whatever reason, he was struggling on the one song. I started having him try different things, flipped the phase on his vocal mic with both ears one, tried one earphone off… He really liked one earphone off and settled on that. I could tell he felt a lot better about it, but the takes were much worse (even he immediately admitted it hearing the playback). We took a break and came back to it later. I had him sit down with his guitar and just play through the song, it must have unscrewed his brain or something because it sounded damn near perfect with him playing it at the same time. I ended up giving him an electric guitar and feeding the line out to his ears so he could play and sing the choruses at the same time. He did great… Hardly any bleed in the vocal mic since it was a quiet tele. No one will hear it in the final version.
I wouldn’t obsess about what the best way to do things is. I guess if you record only yourself, figure out what works best for you in different situations. It’s more important to have a bunch of options under your belt for when you hit walls with clients. Everyone is different, even song to song and day to day sometimes. We all get too far in our own heads for whatever reason sometimes, it can be tough to figure out ways to fix that.
|
|
|
Post by christopher on Nov 6, 2024 10:04:42 GMT -6
That’s some very good producing to take the effort and find the best way. All these years I’ve thought I’ve known my voice, and what it isn’t capable of without a crazy amount of work. Only recently did I learn I’m 2 very different singers: when I sing and play acoustic vs overdubbing. I finally proved to myself that with guitar I will sing and mix my voice into the instrument in real time, and my voice volume matches the instrument. It creates a better musical take. When I try to overdub the same singing style, it’s just different, I can’t seem to mix into the backing tracks that same way. So far I’m not able to get to that next level where overdubs are as good as a live cut. The part of self producing that isn’t easy to get past
|
|
|
Post by notneeson on Nov 7, 2024 9:40:48 GMT -6
That’s some very good producing to take the effort and find the best way. All these years I’ve thought I’ve known my voice, and what it isn’t capable of without a crazy amount of work. Only recently did I learn I’m 2 very different singers: when I sing and play acoustic vs overdubbing. I finally proved to myself that with guitar I will sing and mix my voice into the instrument in real time, and my voice volume matches the instrument. It creates a better musical take. When I try to overdub the same singing style, it’s just different, I can’t seem to mix into the backing tracks that same way. So far I’m not able to get to that next level where overdubs are as good as a live cut. The part of self producing that isn’t easy to get past I’m not some amazing singer, but I really relate to this. The other thing that is working for me is singing to my monitors off axis in the figure 8 null of my BU67. It has a similar “blending” effect compared to singing and playing guitar.
|
|
|
Post by chessparov on Nov 7, 2024 11:35:08 GMT -6
No headphones strikes again! The more natural IMHO equals better take. Chris
|
|