|
Vox AV30?
Aug 26, 2017 12:35:47 GMT -6
via mobile
Post by Quint on Aug 26, 2017 12:35:47 GMT -6
Has anybody tried the Vox AV30? I can't find one around here to play. It seems like it might be an affordable amp well suited for tracking in the studio. The headphone out also works as a line out and has speaker emulation, if you need to track silently. It also is ALL analog. No digital modeling. At the asking price, I'm wondering why I would basically spend the same amount on something like the UAD Fender Tweed when something like this exists?
In the video below, it sounds pretty good.
|
|
|
Post by Ward on Aug 26, 2017 13:58:27 GMT -6
But what would they sound like with some poultry plectrum'ing?
|
|
|
Vox AV30?
Aug 26, 2017 14:01:27 GMT -6
via mobile
Post by Quint on Aug 26, 2017 14:01:27 GMT -6
But what would they sound like with some poultry plectrum'ing? Que?
|
|
|
Post by Ward on Aug 26, 2017 14:04:29 GMT -6
But what would they sound like with some poultry plectrum'ing? Que? chicken pickin'
|
|
|
Vox AV30?
Aug 26, 2017 14:15:21 GMT -6
via mobile
Post by Quint on Aug 26, 2017 14:15:21 GMT -6
Oh, gotcha. I have no idea. I think they sound pretty good in that video though.
|
|
|
Post by johneppstein on Aug 26, 2017 19:46:16 GMT -6
Oh, gotcha. I have no idea. I think they sound pretty good in that video though. Can't trust videos. I'll say this - I wouldn't touch that hype with a 10 foot pole. They claim it's a "tube amp" with ONE 12AX7 in the preamp. That ain't no tube amp - at best it's a hybrid. Probably running in "starved plate" mode. They state that it's a modeling amp. That FOR SURE ain't no tube amp, it's primarily digital. Hybrid two ways. I would avoid. If you want a tube amp, buy a tube amp. If you want a digital modeler, well, there are a lot of options, most probably better. I'd look at plugins if "modeling" is what you want.
|
|
|
Vox AV30?
Aug 26, 2017 19:56:53 GMT -6
via mobile
Post by Quint on Aug 26, 2017 19:56:53 GMT -6
Oh, gotcha. I have no idea. I think they sound pretty good in that video though. Can't trust videos. I'll say this - I wouldn't touch that hype with a 10 foot pole. They claim it's a "tube amp" with ONE 12AX7 in the preamp. That ain't no tube amp - at best it's a hybrid. Probably running in "starved plate" mode. They state that it's a modeling amp. That FOR SURE ain't no tube amp, it's primarily digital. Hybrid two ways. I would avoid. If you want a tube amp, buy a tube amp. If you want a digital modeler, well, there are a lot of options, most probably better. I'd look at plugins if "modeling" is what you want. There are TWO tubes in it, one in the preamp and one in the power section. As I mentioned in my original post, there is NO digital in this amp. It's analog "modeling". The fx section is digital but the amp(s) themselves are all analog. You're correct that it's not tube in the traditional sense but the tubes do play an integral role and seem to have a positive contribution to the sound, especially when compared to digital modellers. Read more about it before dismissing it without knowing anything about it.
|
|
|
Post by johneppstein on Aug 26, 2017 20:48:16 GMT -6
Can't trust videos. I'll say this - I wouldn't touch that hype with a 10 foot pole. They claim it's a "tube amp" with ONE 12AX7 in the preamp. That ain't no tube amp - at best it's a hybrid. Probably running in "starved plate" mode. They state that it's a modeling amp. That FOR SURE ain't no tube amp, it's primarily digital. Hybrid two ways. I would avoid. If you want a tube amp, buy a tube amp. If you want a digital modeler, well, there are a lot of options, most probably better. I'd look at plugins if "modeling" is what you want. There are TWO tubes in it, one in the preamp and one in the power section. As I mentioned in my original post, there is NO digital in this amp. It's analog "modelling". The fx section is digital but the amp(s) themselves are all analog. You're correct that it's not tube in the traditional sense but the tubes do seem to have an integral and positive improvement to the sound, especially compared to digital modellers. Read more about it before dismissing it without knowing anything about it. No. I don't believe sales weasel hype, especially when it doesn't make sense. Give me a schematic to read, I'll believe that. From the Vox website: OK, maybe 2 preamp tubes. No power tubes. A 12AX7 does not put out 30 watts. They claim that the "power section" is "tube equipped" - That's hogwash. Sales-speak to fool the kiddies. A 12AX7 is not a power tube and if one were to configure a power amp around one you'd be lucky to get half a watt, if that. Given that a solid state power amp has no use for a tube phase inverter circuit, the only reason I can see for putting a 12AX7 in the power section would be to provide "toob tone" - which is will not and cannot properly do, as the sound of a tube power section relies on a lot more than sticking a preamp tube in line with the circuit. For one thing it requires an output transformer, which is at least half the sound of a tube power amp. This makes me more convinced that the "tube circuitry" uses starved plate design. Which saves them the cost of a power transformer capable of providing the approximately 250- 300 volts that a 12AX7 needs to work properly. If the FX section is digital there is not "no digital modeling". As far as "analog modeling" is concerned, you can't "model" an amp with at least 3 or 4 preamp tubes, a phase inverter, and two or four power tubes with one 12AX7 (or even two.) There have been real "analog modeling" amps made - they're a lot more complicated, a lot more expensive, and have a lot more tubes. What they're probably doing is just switching different value resistors into the cathode and plate circuits to alter the gain structure a bit. Not real modeling. Without a schematic I can't tell exactly what they're doing, but the whole thing rings false. Without seeing a full schematic I would not touch this with a 10 foot pole. You can't get something for nothing. For only a little more money (if that) I'd go for Vox's little 4 watt all tube amp or spend a bit more for an AC15, which is probably as loud as the 30 watt SS amp anyway. One last thing to think about - how can an amp with a rated output of "30 watts" have a power consumption of only 27? Given that no electronic circuit is 100% efficient, how could this amp even have a power output of even 25 watts? Maybe a class D amp could (technically) come fairly close, but Class D amps don't have toobs in them. Too many things don't add up, too much BS.
|
|
|
Vox AV30?
Aug 26, 2017 21:02:24 GMT -6
via mobile
Post by Quint on Aug 26, 2017 21:02:24 GMT -6
There are TWO tubes in it, one in the preamp and one in the power section. As I mentioned in my original post, there is NO digital in this amp. It's analog "modelling". The fx section is digital but the amp(s) themselves are all analog. You're correct that it's not tube in the traditional sense but the tubes do seem to have an integral and positive improvement to the sound, especially compared to digital modellers. Read more about it before dismissing it without knowing anything about it. No. From the Vox website: OK, maybe 2 preamp tubes. None in the power amp. A 12AX7 does not put out 30 watts. They claim that the "power section" is "tube equipped" - That's hogwash. Sales-speak to fool the kiddies. A 12AX7 is not a power tube and if one were to configure a power amp around one you'd be lucky to get half a watt, if that. Given that a solid state power amp has no use for a tube phase inverter circuit, the only reason I can see for putting a 12AX7 in the power section would be to provide "toob tone" - which is will not and cannot properly do, as the sound of a tube power section relies on a lot more than sticking a preamp tube in line with the circuit. For one thing it requires an output transformer, which is at least half the sound of a tube power amp. This makes me more convinced that the "tube circuitry" uses starved plate design. Which saves them the cost of a power transformer capable of providing the approximately 250- 300 volts that a 12AX7 needs to work properly. If the FX section is digital there is not "no digital modeling". As far as "analog modeling" is concerned, you can't "model" an amp with at least 3 or 4 preamp tubes, a phase inverter, and two or four power tubes with one 12AX7. There have been real "analog modeling" amps made - they're a lot more complicated, a lot more expensive, and have a lot more tubes. Without a schematic I can't tell exactly what they're doing, but the whole thing rings false. Without seeing a full schematic I would not touch this with a 10 foot pole. You can't get something for nothing. For only a little more money (if that) I'd go for Vox's little 4 watt all tube amp or spend a bit more for an AC15, which is probably as loud as the 30 watt SS amp anyway. I'm aware that this is not a true "tube" amp. And I don't care. I just was asking if anybody had played one. There's no need to get so dogmatic about a $300 amp. I don't buy amps based on schematics. I buy them based on sound. If an amp sounds good, I don't really care WHAT is in it. If I remember correctly, the tube in the power section isn't providing power so much as it is providing color, much like you mentioned in the starved plate scenario. The power is provided by a solid state amp. Again, I don't care. I'm just interested in finding something that can be used to track silently with and then reamp later with a REAL tube amp. And, NO, this is not a digitally modeled amp no matter how you try to spin it. An example of a digitally modeled amp would be something like the Vox VT series where the actual amp itself involves digital modeling of various amp circuits. A digitally modeled amp won't work without it. That's not the case with the AV series. The amp itself is all analog. The use of digital FX in the AV series no more makes it a digitally modeled amp than does using a digital reverb pedal with a 1950s Fender Bassman make IT a digitally modeled amp.
|
|
|
Post by johneppstein on Aug 26, 2017 21:11:01 GMT -6
You might want to read my final edit of that post. Or not.
If you're just going to reamp it and want silent recording, why not save some money and just use a DI?
|
|
|
Vox AV30?
Aug 26, 2017 21:19:26 GMT -6
via mobile
Post by Quint on Aug 26, 2017 21:19:26 GMT -6
You might want to read my final edit of that post. Or not. If you're just going to reamp it and want silent recording, why not save some money and just use a DI? What about your final edit? A DI will be used in conjunction with the amp. DI for getting a naked signal for future reamping, AV30 (or some other amp) for monitoring while recording and also for having "something" recorded for playback while in the tracking phase. It may not be the final product but it would be a lot closer than listening to a naked DI track during playback.
|
|
|
Post by johneppstein on Aug 26, 2017 21:28:52 GMT -6
You might want to read my final edit of that post. Or not. If you're just going to reamp it and want silent recording, why not save some money and just use a DI? What about your final edit? A DI will be used in conjunction with the amp. DI for getting a naked signal for future reamping, AV30 (or some other amp) for monitoring while recording and also for having "something" recorded for playback while in the tracking phase. It may not be the final product but it would be a lot closer than listening to a naked DI track during playback. I changed/elaborated on a couple things, and noted discrepancies in their published "specs", such as the fact that the claimed power rating is greater than the maximum power consumption. Just stuff that doesn't add up. When they make errors that are THAT easily caught why should I believe anything they say? I'd think that the 4 watt all tube amp (AC4TV) would be a better investment for your purpose. Same money. Not silent though, but it does have power selection down to 1/4 watt..
|
|
|
Vox AV30?
Aug 26, 2017 21:34:50 GMT -6
via mobile
Post by Quint on Aug 26, 2017 21:34:50 GMT -6
What about your final edit? A DI will be used in conjunction with the amp. DI for getting a naked signal for future reamping, AV30 (or some other amp) for monitoring while recording and also for having "something" recorded for playback while in the tracking phase. It may not be the final product but it would be a lot closer than listening to a naked DI track during playback. I changed/elaborated on a couple things, and noted discrepancies in their published "specs", such as the fact that the claimed power rating is greater than the maximum power consumption. Just stuff that doesn't add up. When they make errors that are THAT easily caught why should I believe anything they say? I'd think that the 4 watt all tube amp (AC4TV) would be a better investment for your purpose. Same money. Not silent though, but it does have power selection down to 1/4 watt.. So are you claiming it's NOT an all analog amp? Because I promise you that it is. And no need to bring up the FX section again. That's nothing to do with the discussion at hand. We're talking about the amp, not the fx which are ancillary and a non-essential part of the amp. Same money. Different capabilities. Different goals. I can't silently track with an AC4. I already own plenty of nice tube amps for when I don't need to track silently. I don't need suggestions on which amp to get that DOESN'T meet my needs. Now back on topic. Has anyone played an AV30?
|
|
|
Post by Ward on Aug 29, 2017 15:12:37 GMT -6
Now back on topic. Has anyone played an AV30? Perhaps the most important point in the thread. And best question!
|
|
|
Vox AV30?
Aug 29, 2017 16:53:47 GMT -6
via mobile
Post by Quint on Aug 29, 2017 16:53:47 GMT -6
Now back on topic. Has anyone played an AV30? Perhaps the most important point in the thread. And best question! Yes. I can't find one around here to play on but I'm definitely curious. I had been kicking around getting a reactive load box of some type (Rivera, Suhr, Radial, Two Notes, etc) to use to track silently with my various amps and whatever amps someone may bring in but this option is even more expensive than the Vox AV30, would require the availability of a speaker output jack on said amps and would require more than one unit for different outputs loads on different amps. I still may go the reactive load route but the Vox seems interesting as a cheap way to track silently through a variance of tone types without involving any digital modeling and then reamp later with the naked DI track through whatever amp is desired.
|
|
|
Post by Ned Ward on Aug 30, 2017 10:30:42 GMT -6
I don't know how this compares to the Suhr Reactive load, but it does have an impedance switch vs. having to buy multiples. And it's reactive load vs. resistive load. That way, you can use any amp to get the tone you want. www.tedweber.com/minimass
|
|
|
Post by johneppstein on Aug 30, 2017 13:19:28 GMT -6
www.tedweber.com/mass-iii4, 8, 16 ohms. Contains an actual speaker motor (magnet, voice coil, and spider) for a reactive load that behaves like a speaker. Bass and treble controls. Hand built by Ted Weber. Advertised price is $286, which I believe compares very favorably to the Vox AV30. I just have never met any solid state amp from any company that used gratuitous tubes for 'toob tone" that I didn't dislike. And it's impossible to get the true sound of a tube power section without a real output transformer, because the transformer is half the tone.
|
|
|
Post by Ward on Aug 30, 2017 17:35:58 GMT -6
www.tedweber.com/mass-iii4, 8, 16 ohms. Contains an actual speaker motor (magnet, voice coil, and spider) for a reactive load that behaves like a speaker. Bass and treble controls. Hand built by Ted Weber. Advertised price is $286, which I believe compares very favorably to the Vox AV30. I just have never met any solid state amp from any company that used gratuitous tubes for 'toob tone" that I didn't dislike. And it's impossible to get the true sound of a tube power section without a real output transformer, because the transformer is half the tone. NOt an amplifier, but the Hermida Audio Zen Drive 2, with the 12AX7 definitely provides dumble-like tube overdrive. It is just like the best gravy on the best biscuits EVER.
|
|
|
Post by johneppstein on Aug 30, 2017 19:40:35 GMT -6
www.tedweber.com/mass-iii4, 8, 16 ohms. Contains an actual speaker motor (magnet, voice coil, and spider) for a reactive load that behaves like a speaker. Bass and treble controls. Hand built by Ted Weber. Advertised price is $286, which I believe compares very favorably to the Vox AV30. I just have never met any solid state amp from any company that used gratuitous tubes for 'toob tone" that I didn't dislike. And it's impossible to get the true sound of a tube power section without a real output transformer, because the transformer is half the tone. NOt an amplifier, but the Hermida Audio Zen Drive 2, with the 12AX7 definitely provides dumble-like tube overdrive. It is just like the best gravy on the best biscuits EVER. Dumble-like? I'll believe it when I hear it. A lot of people companies claim emulation of Howard's work. And if what I just read on the web is true it didn't use a tube, it emulated the tube with a MOSFET. Does sound like an interesting pedal.
|
|
|
Post by Ward on Aug 30, 2017 20:47:47 GMT -6
NOt an amplifier, but the Hermida Audio Zen Drive 2, with the 12AX7 definitely provides dumble-like tube overdrive. It is just like the best gravy on the best biscuits EVER. Dumble-like? I'll believe it when I hear it. A lot of people companies claim emulation of Howard's work. And if what I just read on the web is true it didn't use a tube, it emulated the tube with a MOSFET. Does sound like an interesting pedal. The Zen Drive is a mosfet, The Zen Drive 2 uses a 12ax7 I have been blessed to both have tried several OSs and spoken to Howard/Alexander at length before he completely disappeared. { winetree probably knows where he is, since he was last seen in his area. ) AND... if it's good enough for Robin Ford, well who am I to argue? Man has tone for days
|
|
|
Vox AV30?
Aug 30, 2017 21:15:59 GMT -6
via mobile
Post by Quint on Aug 30, 2017 21:15:59 GMT -6
I don't know how this compares to the Suhr Reactive load, but it does have an impedance switch vs. having to buy multiples. And it's reactive load vs. resistive load. That way, you can use any amp to get the tone you want. www.tedweber.com/minimassI've been looking at those as a possibility. I need to read more about them.
|
|
|
Vox AV30?
Aug 30, 2017 21:27:54 GMT -6
via mobile
Post by Quint on Aug 30, 2017 21:27:54 GMT -6
www.tedweber.com/mass-iii4, 8, 16 ohms. Contains an actual speaker motor (magnet, voice coil, and spider) for a reactive load that behaves like a speaker. Bass and treble controls. Hand built by Ted Weber. Advertised price is $286, which I believe compares very favorably to the Vox AV30. I just have never met any solid state amp from any company that used gratuitous tubes for 'toob tone" that I didn't dislike. And it's impossible to get the true sound of a tube power section without a real output transformer, because the transformer is half the tone. I get what you're saying and I don't necessarily disagree. But I'll reiterate that "pristine" tone was never a focus of mine in this particular context. Best case scenario would always involve great tube amps being tracked live along with everything else at one time. But sometimes the reality is that the situation calls for a need to to be able track amps silently. It is what it is.... Once that situation is entered, everything is a compromise to one degree or another. At that point, it simply becomes about what compromises you are willing to live with. So..... I can either purchase an amp like the AV30, which may not tickle your notion of tube purity, but, for the sake of tracking, could get the job done, or buy a reactive load box. Either is a compromise on tone. Pick your poison...
|
|
|
Post by johneppstein on Aug 31, 2017 0:30:27 GMT -6
AND... if it's good enough for Robin Ford, well who am I to argue? Man has tone for days Well, you do have a point there. Robben, I believe.
|
|
|
Post by Ward on Aug 31, 2017 12:47:40 GMT -6
AND... if it's good enough for Robin Ford, well who am I to argue? Man has tone for days Well, you do have a point there. Robben, I believe. CONSARN IT, SIRI!! Again???
|
|
|
Vox AV30?
Sept 1, 2017 12:24:51 GMT -6
via mobile
Post by Quint on Sept 1, 2017 12:24:51 GMT -6
Screw it. I think I'm just going to get one and see how it goes.
|
|