|
Post by Dan on Oct 2, 2024 13:21:11 GMT -6
Just to play devils advocate for a moment...if you're loving the sound of the Tree Audio Branch II, why not just stick with that? Why do you need a 1073? Neves are great and all, but if the Tree Audio is giving you what you want why not just spend that money on another compressor or other outboard? Great question. I think it’s because I feel like I need a solid state option for recording vocals to complement the tube sound of the Tree Audio. The Neve 1073 is a classic and has been used on many records in the past. The closest thing I have to this sound is the Avedis MA5, but it’s in 500 series format and doesn’t have an EQ section. Believe me, I actually considered simply getting another compressor, but I thought it would be wiser to start with the Neve 1073 preamp first. Theoretically, I have 3 rack compressors already because I have the LA-2A, 1176 and the optical compressor on the Branch Channel strip. With that said, owning the aforementioned compressors has not quelled my desire for a Retro 176 or Chandler RS 124. If you have an Avedis ma5, you don’t need a 1073 lol. You already have a cleaned up 1073 with most of the extreme wtf that must be dealt with in the mix removed from the circuit. If you want a clean pre, buy a grace or something. Even an FMR RNP or Kush Omega. Used millennia, gml, and hardy too. Don’t waste too much money.
|
|
|
Post by mythundreamt on Oct 2, 2024 13:30:08 GMT -6
And don’t not try a BAE 1073 module. I sold my original after getting one of those. The Heritage and AMS I bought and sold weren’t that different, but to me the BAE was the closest. Just my limited experience. Which BAE and AMS Model versions were you comparing (BAE 1073 With EQ and filter- AMS same Hardwired) ? Thanks Yes the 1073 module against the AMS handwired module. As stated later in the thread, the BAE was a bit rolled off in the highs (aka darker) and the AMS a little crisper (aka modern?) but the BAE was closer to my og 1073 which was a touch less "dark". All tests done blind, including DI'ed electric guitar so that even the performance was identical. I finally ended up with a few BAE 1028s and even those now have been replaced because I use the PEQ2s in my console. Anyone wanna buy a pristine BAE 1028? lol Mind you the differences were VERY small. A Tree Audio Branch (v1) that I had also had later was a bigger difference... one tube preamp and solid state preamp is a lovely toolset for vocals.
|
|
|
Post by tonycamphd on Oct 2, 2024 13:34:45 GMT -6
Great question. I think it’s because I feel like I need a solid state option for recording vocals to complement the tube sound of the Tree Audio. The Neve 1073 is a classic and has been used on many records in the past. The closest thing I have to this sound is the Avedis MA5, but it’s in 500 series format and doesn’t have an EQ section. Believe me, I actually considered simply getting another compressor, but I thought it would be wiser to start with the Neve 1073 preamp first. Theoretically, I have 3 rack compressors already because I have the LA-2A, 1176 and the optical compressor on the Branch Channel strip. With that said, owning the aforementioned compressors has not quelled my desire for a Retro 176 or Chandler RS 124. If you have an Avedis ma5, you don’t need a 1073 lol. You already have a cleaned up 1073 with most of the extreme wtf that must be dealt with in the mix removed from the circuit. If you want a clean pre, buy a grace or something. Even an FMR RNP or Kush Omega. Used millennia, gml, and hardy too. Don’t waste too much money. Agreed, use what u have a then figure out what you need, I have 6-1176d’s, 2-1176A’s, 4-la3a’s etc, they are cool, but there is reason I have racks stuffed with aphex and dbx, they do what I need front end. I also sold all my neve knockoff stuff as I always find neve to be unsatisfactorily murky in the low mids, I am an api guy all the way with red47 and rca tube pres on the side, took me some time to come to it, just use what u have and breath bro 😎
|
|
|
Post by christopher on Oct 2, 2024 14:06:30 GMT -6
I can give a million reasons to go for cheaper options, I get it. The sooner you go for the hardware modules, the sooner you’ll kill the lust and decide what to sell, if anything. Honestly 500 series probably isn’t the issue, it’s probably tube vs SS.
Tubes vs SS is like a B52 vs a commuter jet. But you often can’t land a b52 where you want to.
|
|
peezy
Full Member
Posts: 42
Member is Online
|
Post by peezy on Oct 2, 2024 14:13:13 GMT -6
If your looking for 1073 esque the miktek mpa201 is where I'd go. I sold my bae after I got one.
Two channels with ami transformers. Line in so you can run mixes through the transformers. Thing is heavy and built well. It has impedance options and a smooth BB button that removes the transistor. With the smooth button engaged out rounds the low end and smooths the top end. Plus the bottom has a bit more fatness. It's subtle but it's there.
It can be clean or colored. Can be picked up for $500 and is stupid deal of the day if you ask me.
|
|
|
Post by drumster on Oct 2, 2024 14:13:15 GMT -6
Great question. I think it’s because I feel like I need a solid state option for recording vocals to complement the tube sound of the Tree Audio. The Neve 1073 is a classic and has been used on many records in the past. The closest thing I have to this sound is the Avedis MA5, but it’s in 500 series format and doesn’t have an EQ section. Believe me, I actually considered simply getting another compressor, but I thought it would be wiser to start with the Neve 1073 preamp first. Theoretically, I have 3 rack compressors already because I have the LA-2A, 1176 and the optical compressor on the Branch Channel strip. With that said, owning the aforementioned compressors has not quelled my desire for a Retro 176 or Chandler RS 124. If you have an Avedis ma5, you don’t need a 1073 lol. You already have a cleaned up 1073 with most of the extreme wtf that must be dealt with in the mix removed from the circuit. If you want a clean pre, buy a grace or something. Even an FMR RNP or Kush Omega. Used millennia, gml, and hardy too. Don’t waste too much money. I appreciate your opinion on the matter. The Avedis MA5 is not my favourite preamp, especially when paired up with the U67. This is why I wasn't sure about adding an AMS Neve 1073 preamp to my studio. However, after speaking with an engineer friend of mine from down in LA, I decided to reconsider. He has a lot of experience with the AMS Neve 1073 units and said that he will use the DPX 1073 even more than his vintage modules because they sound so good at a lower price point. He said that part of the reason that I am likely not excited about the sound of the MA5 is because it's in 500 series format, uses Jensen transformers instead of Marinair and doesn't have the EQ section. He is confident that I will really like the AMS Neve 1073, so that's it's been my top contender for a solid state preamp. I considered the Millenia, and GML a few months back, but ended up going with the Tree Audio Branch, which I find to be very transparent and sweet in the high end. As a result, I think I'm looking for something with more colour and mojo when it comes to this solid state preamp.
|
|
|
Post by drumster on Oct 2, 2024 14:17:53 GMT -6
I can give a million reasons to go for cheaper options, I get it. The sooner you go for the hardware modules, the sooner you’ll kill the lust and decide what to sell, if anything. Honestly 500 series probably isn’t the issue, it’s probably tube vs SS. Tubes vs SS is like a B52 vs a commuter jet. But you often can’t land a b52 where you want to. Your analogy is spot on! I love the sound of the Branch, but I don't want it to be my only preamp in rack format. I envisioned recording some lead vocals with the Branch and then using the 1073 for background vocals because of how well it seems to glue background vocals together. The internal battle is strong for the hand wired modules, but the DPX might be the better choice for cost and practicality reasons.
|
|
|
Post by drumster on Oct 2, 2024 14:19:24 GMT -6
If your looking for 1073 esque the miktek mpa201 is where I'd go. I sold my bae after I got one. Two channels with ami transformers. Line in so you can run mixes through the transformers. Thing is heavy and built well. It has impedance options and a smooth BB button that removes the transistor. With the smooth button engaged out rounds the low end and smooths the top end. Plus the bottom has a bit more fatness. It's subtle but it's there. It can be clean or colored. Can be picked up for $500 and is stupid deal of the day if you ask me. Thanks for the suggestion! I've never heard of that preamp before. I do have a Miktek CV4 that I had modded by Shannon Rhoades about 10 years ago, but that's my only experience with the brand.
|
|
|
Post by Johnkenn on Oct 2, 2024 14:29:16 GMT -6
I agree with dok , Do you want a great vox tracking compressor? Or the greatest vox tracking compressor ever built?😂 JMO, a 651 is an almost invisible vox tracking comp, a modded one is absolutely invisible, you could buy 5 for the price of one of the fancy ones that give you more color and almost no control. I have 4 over the moon modded 651's that are 100% of the time used for vox tracking, they have styrene caps and AD4898's ic's through the entire audio path. Pic is my drum tracking rack. I actually have double more 651's and 160xt's, the modded ones get used for any purity tracks and the stocker transformer based 160xt's get used for individual r&r drums for old school dirt, i very much subscribe to the "if everything is dirty nothing is dirty, if everything is clean nothing is clean" school of thought, it looks like you have the color covered, lots of parameter control gives you the opportunity to control the musicality and groove of what you are working on. Of course jme, hope this helps you and saves you some $ View AttachmentI had an unmodded one at one point...and it was really tweaky...or I just never was able to get it to get set correctly. Either too much or too little.
|
|
|
Post by dok on Oct 2, 2024 14:38:08 GMT -6
I agree with dok , Do you want a great vox tracking compressor? Or the greatest vox tracking compressor ever built?😂 JMO, a 651 is an almost invisible vox tracking comp, a modded one is absolutely invisible, you could buy 5 for the price of one of the fancy ones that give you more color and almost no control. I have 4 over the moon modded 651's that are 100% of the time used for vox tracking, they have styrene caps and AD4898's ic's through the entire audio path. Pic is my drum tracking rack. I actually have double more 651's and 160xt's, the modded ones get used for any purity tracks and the stocker transformer based 160xt's get used for individual r&r drums for old school dirt, i very much subscribe to the "if everything is dirty nothing is dirty, if everything is clean nothing is clean" school of thought, it looks like you have the color covered, lots of parameter control gives you the opportunity to control the musicality and groove of what you are working on. Of course jme, hope this helps you and saves you some $ View AttachmentI had an unmodded one at one point...and it was really tweaky...or I just never was able to get it to get set correctly. Either too much or too little. I have an unmodded one. It's hard to find the sweet spot with just 2-3dB shaving for peaks because the metering is pretty imprecise, but it is indeed easy to go overboard.
|
|
|
Post by skav on Oct 2, 2024 14:48:58 GMT -6
IMO neither is objectively better than the other. BAE is a bit darker, AMS Neve more modern sounding IME. Some associate darker with vintage, which may be true, I don't know. Ultimately depends on your taste and source. Will you be using EQ on the way in? Are your main recording source drums? Are you able to try one out? IME neither companys e-mail support is very strong. AMS a little better though, and you can reach them by phone quite easily which is a big plus to me. I'd go with the AMS. Not trying to sway your decision, just show that there are those who like them too For compressors, few things beat an 1176 IMO. I am a fan of the 1178 style myself, which is cleaner tham your reissue. I have an Audioscape clone myself. It's a dual channel and can come in handy for mixing too. To answer your questions, I will be EQ’ing on the way in. The main use for the 1073 would be for vocal tracking. The only unit that I am able to try out for a 30 day money back guarantee in my studio is the AMS 1073 SPX or DPX. Order and try out a 1073 SPX and see if it's what you're looking for? Plenty of professional studios use them, aswell as the DPX and BAE ofcourse. But since your only option for try & refund is AMS Neve, I think you should consider that.
|
|
|
Post by OtisGreying on Oct 2, 2024 16:12:59 GMT -6
Fav pre's are Sound Techniques ZR 7064 and Coil CA70.
I do want a BAE 1084 pair at some point, but that'd probably go to mixing duties.
For vocal tracking the Lisson Grove compressor is fantastic. I love that thing and currently track Vox and ACS gtr through it.
|
|
|
Post by Tbone81 on Oct 2, 2024 16:39:46 GMT -6
Just to play devils advocate for a moment...if you're loving the sound of the Tree Audio Branch II, why not just stick with that? Why do you need a 1073? Neves are great and all, but if the Tree Audio is giving you what you want why not just spend that money on another compressor or other outboard? Great question. I think it’s because I feel like I need a solid state option for recording vocals to complement the tube sound of the Tree Audio. The Neve 1073 is a classic and has been used on many records in the past. The closest thing I have to this sound is the Avedis MA5, but it’s in 500 series format and doesn’t have an EQ section. Believe me, I actually considered simply getting another compressor, but I thought it would be wiser to start with the Neve 1073 preamp first. Theoretically, I have 3 rack compressors already because I have the LA-2A, 1176 and the optical compressor on the Branch Channel strip. With that said, owning the aforementioned compressors has not quelled my desire for a Retro 176 or Chandler RS 124. Gotcha, I'm assuming you generally like the sound of the Avedis MA5 on your voice, and like you said before, are mainly looking to get out of 500 series. In that case I'd be making the decision based on feature set as much as on sound. AMS Neve, BAE, and all the usual suspects are all going to sound great. There will be subtle differences between them that may or may not be meaningful to you. But I think having things like optional digital out is equally as important.
|
|
|
Post by drumster on Oct 2, 2024 17:55:13 GMT -6
To answer your questions, I will be EQ’ing on the way in. The main use for the 1073 would be for vocal tracking. The only unit that I am able to try out for a 30 day money back guarantee in my studio is the AMS 1073 SPX or DPX. Order and try out a 1073 SPX and see if it's what you're looking for? Plenty of professional studios use them, aswell as the DPX and BAE ofcourse. But since your only option for try & refund is AMS Neve, I think you should consider that. I am strongly considering buying the DPX with the 30 day window. I say the DPX because the SPX is not going to be in stock until mid-November or later. It wasn’t my original plan to go with the stereo version, but it may come in useful for my synths and as a hardware insert during mixing.
|
|
|
Post by drumster on Oct 2, 2024 18:01:29 GMT -6
Great question. I think it’s because I feel like I need a solid state option for recording vocals to complement the tube sound of the Tree Audio. The Neve 1073 is a classic and has been used on many records in the past. The closest thing I have to this sound is the Avedis MA5, but it’s in 500 series format and doesn’t have an EQ section. Believe me, I actually considered simply getting another compressor, but I thought it would be wiser to start with the Neve 1073 preamp first. Theoretically, I have 3 rack compressors already because I have the LA-2A, 1176 and the optical compressor on the Branch Channel strip. With that said, owning the aforementioned compressors has not quelled my desire for a Retro 176 or Chandler RS 124. Gotcha, I'm assuming you generally like the sound of the Avedis MA5 on your voice, and like you said before, are mainly looking to get out of 500 series. In that case I'd be making the decision based on feature set as much as on sound. AMS Neve, BAE, and all the usual suspects are all going to sound great. There will be subtle differences between them that may or may not be meaningful to you. But I think having things like optional digital out is equally as important. Thanks for your advice! To be honest the MA5 is not my favourite 500 series preamp. I actually prefer my Electrodyne 501 and Crane Song Syren to it. I don’t find the MA5 very flattering with the U67. It sounds a bit cloudy and lacks the mid range punch and clarity of the Electrodyne 501. My hope is that I will like the AMS 1073 SPX/DPX or 80 series module much more with its larger transformers, bigger power supply and EQ section.
|
|
|
Post by drumster on Oct 2, 2024 18:14:04 GMT -6
Fav pre's are Sound Techniques ZR 7064 and Coil CA70. I do want a BAE 1084 pair at some point, but that'd probably go to mixing duties. For vocal tracking the Lisson Grove compressor is fantastic. I love that thing and currently track Vox and ACS gtr through it. I really wanted a Coil Audio CA70 a few months back, but was steered away from it by my rep at Vintage King. He said that the Coil would be too dark and coloured for my U67 Reissue and suggested the Tree Audio Branch instead. Coil gets a lot of love on these forums, so I wonder what type of music people are using them for. Any tracks I've heard with it have a very 70's sound to them, which is not really what I'm doing. I'm much more in the late 80's and early 90's direction.
|
|
|
Post by tonycamphd on Oct 2, 2024 18:34:20 GMT -6
To answer your questions, I will be EQ’ing on the way in. The main use for the 1073 would be for vocal tracking. The only unit that I am able to try out for a 30 day money back guarantee in my studio is the AMS 1073 SPX or DPX. Order and try out a 1073 SPX and see if it's what you're looking for? Plenty of professional studios use them, aswell as the DPX and BAE ofcourse. But since your only option for try & refund is AMS Neve, I think you should consider that. This is a common problem with them and I’m not sure why they made them that way, the thing to do is drive the input harder than u think u need to, it needs a lot of input gain to function as it should, it takes a lot more than u’d think to distort them
|
|
|
Post by drumster on Oct 2, 2024 18:39:48 GMT -6
Order and try out a 1073 SPX and see if it's what you're looking for? Plenty of professional studios use them, aswell as the DPX and BAE ofcourse. But since your only option for try & refund is AMS Neve, I think you should consider that. This is a common problem with them and I’m not sure why they made them that way, the thing to do is drive the input harder than u think u need to, it needs a lot of input gain to function as it should, it takes a lot more than u’d think to distort them Just to clarify, do you mean to drive the input harder on the 1073 SPX/DPX before engaging the onboard EQ? I was confused by your statement about this being a common problem with them.
|
|
|
Post by tonycamphd on Oct 2, 2024 20:47:56 GMT -6
This is a common problem with them and I’m not sure why they made them that way, the thing to do is drive the input harder than u think u need to, it needs a lot of input gain to function as it should, it takes a lot more than u’d think to distort them Just to clarify, do you mean to drive the input harder on the 1073 SPX/DPX before engaging the onboard EQ? I was confused by your statement about this being a common problem with them. I'm still talking about the 651👍
|
|
|
Post by Dan on Oct 3, 2024 0:47:56 GMT -6
easy rider switch adds program dependency, negating need for serial compression, lowering distortion. Tube stage can be disabled. Got u D, I never use auto anything lol, never even tried it, the ubiquitous control parameters were what turned me on to the 651 in the first place, absolute control yo! Why take the easy way when u can torture yourself lol you should try the compressors with two detectors you can control then like kotelnikov, mdwdrc (buggy!), dynone, Oxford dynamics or ones that let you control the program dependency like the Weiss ds1 (blend the releases, chose the right lookahead/hold but not too long, and the right amount of rms smoothing, and use the improved limiter on the softube one to control overshoot! Raise the gain and lower the gain into it), stc-8 (peak stop), presswerk (adapt), molot ge (secondary attack and release and the limiter), and unisum (the entire lower panel is a mind fuck) The automatic attack and release are necessary for natural action. See this video on Elysia auto fast attack as an example. The stc-8 has a similar peak override functionality, kotelnikov has an auto release for short transients, and Oxford dynamics an entirely separate limiter process that can be selected in lieu of the compressor
|
|
|
Post by thehightenor on Oct 3, 2024 1:53:48 GMT -6
Hey Everyone, As a follow up to my previous thread from a few months ago, I am currently in the midst of buying gear for my new studio configuration. To make a long story short, I am moving away from 500 series gear and into full size rack gear. My main microphone is a Neumann U67 Reissue, and I just picked up a Tree Audio Branch II tube channel strip. I also invested in an LA-2A Reissue and a UREI 1176 LN Revision F to be used as vocal tracking compressors. In terms of EQ, I picked up the Pultec 500 series EQP-500-X. My next step is to invest in an AMS Neve 1073 preamp, so I’m trying to decide which model to go with. Should I go with the classic, hand wired 1073 CV module and AMS 3U rack, or should I save the money and get a 1073 SPX or DPX? Is the hand wired classic module worth the extra investment in terms of sonics? If I go with the more affordable 1073 SPX/DPX, I could also invest in another vocal tracking compressor. On that note, I’m thinking about picking up one of the following compressors: Chandler RS124, Retro 176 or Retro STA Level. Which of those would be the best one to add to my LA-2A and 1176? Thanks in advance for your help! I'd say split the difference and get a BAE 1073. +1 I demoed the AMS units and thought they sounded a bit “vanilla” Then demoed a BAE 1073D and thought WOW! Bought the BAE - to my ears it’s got that Neve vintage vibe in buckets. Sounds great into any vocal tracking comp.
|
|
|
Post by OtisGreying on Oct 3, 2024 2:06:36 GMT -6
Fav pre's are Sound Techniques ZR 7064 and Coil CA70. I do want a BAE 1084 pair at some point, but that'd probably go to mixing duties. For vocal tracking the Lisson Grove compressor is fantastic. I love that thing and currently track Vox and ACS gtr through it. I really wanted a Coil Audio CA70 a few months back, but was steered away from it by my rep at Vintage King. He said that the Coil would be too dark and coloured for my U67 Reissue and suggested the Tree Audio Branch instead. Coil gets a lot of love on these forums, so I wonder what type of music people are using them for. Any tracks I've heard with it have a very 70's sound to them, which is not really what I'm doing. I'm much more in the late 80's and early 90's direction. I personally think you buying the best of the best is a good strategy so you put it behind you and focus on making music. It's important to have tools your confident in and are excited to use. Obviously only if you can afford it though. If I were in the market for a SS pre no compromise I'd look at BAE, Sound techniques ZR7064, or RND shelford, Chandler LTD1. For 1073 I really like BAE cause its so well made its like a tank, and I owned one but had to sell it cause I needed money, but remember it sounding great, I think it has more color than AMS and for me thats a good thing if you're spending all that money on an analog pre. Sound techiques ZR is my favorite though, its the original Trident A range channel strips used by the beatles and elton john.
For tube I love my Coil. It can be very hi-fi if you record digital. I'm sure the tree branch is also fantastic and I would also place that preamp in the category of no-compromise, so I don't think you need to worry about a tube preamp.
|
|
|
Post by Vincent R. on Oct 3, 2024 7:40:56 GMT -6
I wish I could tell you the difference between the hand wired Neve 1073 and the DPX. I will say the DPX is wonderful sounding. I’ve owned and used it for a while now. None of the 500 series Neve preamps I’ve heard really sound the same as the rack mounted ones. The low end seems to be less extended in them at minimum and often the high end is more open. Doesn’t mean it won’t work for you, as you can see plenty of people love them. I have found there are groups that love AMS and groups that love BAE. Both are solid as far as I have heard. For me the BAE is more rolled off on the top and had a big mid push. AMS is more shimmery on the top with a deep low end. I would say you could easily argue they sound like two separate channels of the same console. I just received a Stam 1073 MPA and I’d say it leans more toward the BAE side. I just posted a comparison of my DPX and Stam MPA on another thread. If money isn’t the issue, I’d be looking at a 1084. It has a more useful EQ.
As for compressors. I have the audio scape versions of the LA2A (Opto) and STA Level (V Comp). The Opto has a smiley face curve; shimmery high end, boosted low end. The V Comp is thick sounding with a kind of frowny face curve; top end and bottom end are fine, but it has a boosted mid range which thickens the whole signal. They are both nice for different things. I’ve mostly been using my TLA-100 these days whose response is more linear, and sits somewhere in between.
|
|
|
Post by Dan on Oct 3, 2024 8:03:42 GMT -6
I really wanted a Coil Audio CA70 a few months back, but was steered away from it by my rep at Vintage King. He said that the Coil would be too dark and coloured for my U67 Reissue and suggested the Tree Audio Branch instead. Coil gets a lot of love on these forums, so I wonder what type of music people are using them for. Any tracks I've heard with it have a very 70's sound to them, which is not really what I'm doing. I'm much more in the late 80's and early 90's direction. I personally think you buying the best of the best is a good strategy so you put it behind you and focus on making music. It's important to have tools you’re confident in and are excited to use. Obviously only if you can afford it though. If I were in the market for a SS pre no compromise I'd look at BAE, Sound techniques ZR7064, or RND shelford, Chandler LTD1. For 1073 I really like BAE cause its so well made its like a tank, and I owned one but had to sell it cause I needed money, but remember it sounding great, I think it has more color than AMS and for me thats a good thing if you're spending all that money on an analog pre. Sound techiques ZR is my favorite though, its the original Trident A range channel strips used by the beatles and elton john.
For tube I love my Coil. It can be very hi-fi if you record digital. I'm sure the tree branch is also fantastic and I would also place that preamp in the category of no-compromise, so I don't think you need to worry about a tube preamp.
this stuff isn’t the best of the best and ultimate gets in the way of the music being performed because it is distorted with very small sweet spots. 1073 is an early solid state pre that’s almost copied from tube designs but with an absolutely wtf transformer loading and termination that the cleaned up versions seem to fix. It’s a design flaw and easily dirtier in the real world than cleaner tube amps and other early solid state amps that don’t have the 1073’s weirdo transformer issues. 1176 is boxy or gritty and only great for a small amount of gain reduction than the slow meter doesn’t reflect unless you want a drastically over compressed sound. If it were perfect, cleaner fet compressors and then vcas wouldn’t have come out. The amplifier and not great auto release is a huge culprit to the sound and it used a very mic pre type circuit that cannot be pushed with an attenuator. For all the really clever and useful design choices that went into many classic pieces of equipment, they often seem to have just taken basic circuits from prior designs if they worked. La2a pretty much just cobbled together and pretty clever. Response depends entirely on the optical detector which is very slow, sometimes slower than your entire song in releasing, and then speeds up with greater gain reduction, sometimes way too fast to emulsify the audio past a certain point on your unit. Then there’s the tube stage the overcompressed audio (the metering does not really reflect the speed up at all) is often pushed hard into. Again if it were perfect, faster and more consistent optical compressors, vcas, and then cleaned up vcas in the late 90s and 2000s wouldn’t have come out with multiple sweet spots or program dependencies that you often don’t have to automate your way out of. Again we are not talking Aphex, Crane Song, GML, Grace, Maselec, and Millenia here. We’re not even talking about well-built similar products as the overhyped internet gear but with the major design flaws corrected.
|
|
|
Post by svart on Oct 3, 2024 8:24:01 GMT -6
Honestly I like API on vocals a little better usually, due to the slightly mid-forward sound vs. a neve.
But then again, I'd use either one and not lose a minute of sleep over the choice.
I will say that an 1176A is the best vocal compressor I've used, and I use it by itself typically doing about 10dB GR.
I'll say it again, I've spent so much time and energy in the past agonizing over small details and small differences in sound and it really meant nothing in the long run. The difference in sound between neve clones will be less than the differences between the singer's voice between takes. It really doesn't matter that much as long as you have a preamp of pro quality.
|
|